tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-35942922032956250422024-03-13T22:03:04.329-07:00~ APPRENTI ~ "leer-jong" Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.comBlogger91125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-40602188585949333052015-11-08T06:51:00.002-08:002016-01-02T02:03:17.252-08:00QUOTES iii<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">"The question "What is Now' may be more relevant by asking : 'Where is Now ?' It is Now-Here.</span></i></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">"Somethymes Now-Here is nowhere. ~ Looking beyond here & now implies looking now-here."</span></i></span><br />
<i><span style="color: #d5a6bd;"><br /></span></i>
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><i>"When the limitation is identified, the denial gets born</i>." ::<span style="color: #674ea7;"><i>"When one's intelligence meets its limitation, then the denial gets born</i>."</span> </span><br />
<br />
<i><span style="color: #674ea7;">"Me-Mory is a Member of Human's Mind" ~ So Mind needs to be Re-Minded to
this (integral) Member; calling it "Re-Member-ing".</span></i><br />
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #674ea7;">"<i>When My My-ths are based on My positive Emotions and therefore have
become a part of Me or My M-Emory or Me-Mory they are right to Re Main
within My Intelligence and are worth to be Re-Member-ed being a ME-mber
of My Me--mory or Re-Mem-Bra-i-nce</i>."</span><br />
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><i>"What about "the ID-iot ID-ea cons-ID-dering ID-entification of ID-olized ID-iolectuality" ?"</i></span><br />
<br />
<i><span style="color: #674ea7;">"Go0d said : "I am = God + 0 = 1 + some imaginary transcendents" (e^i.Pi)." So when "1 am = 1 + e^i.Pi" then "am = e^i.Pi" & "am" :: "em" :: "EM" :: Electro~Magneto frequencies. </span></i><br />
<br />
<i><span style="color: #674ea7;">"Silence is the "Soundless Space" that is left over, after eliminating
all Noises you hear. So the Character of this Silence is coherent with
one's Intelligence considering the Potential to eliminate." </span></i></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-84663751819195743782014-11-30T05:18:00.001-08:002014-11-30T05:18:07.173-08:00ASSOCIATIE - van Wilber naar Bergson via Spiral Dynamics <div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<h3 class="post-title entry-title" itemprop="name">
</h3>
<div class="post-header">
</div>
<span class="mw-headline"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="color: red;"><b>ASSOCIATIE - de kunst tot het maken van gehelen ?</b></span></span></span><br />
<span class="mw-headline"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: xx-small;"><br /></span></span></span>
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12px;">I<span style="color: purple;">edereen
wil precies weten waaruit iets is opgebouwd, analyseren viert hoogtij.
Helaas wordt door al deze analyses vaak de bron uit het oog verloren, de
samenhang vervalt vaak net zo snel tijdens dit ingeslagen pad van
analyse. Daardoor creëert men in geval van problemen vaak oplossingen en
blijven.</span></span></span><br />
<span style="color: purple; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: purple; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12px;">Ik
heb analyse vervangen door diagnose en hierin de splitsing gemaakt
tussen de analytische en de associatieve diagnose. Die laatste heb ik
hier uiteen gezet.</span></span><br />
<span style="color: purple; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12px;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: purple; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 12px;"><i><u>Associatieve diagnose</u></i></span></span><br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;"><span style="color: purple;">In
essentie wil ik het inzicht graag boven water zien te krijgen, omdat ik vermoed
– vanuit Bergson’s filosofieën – dat hier fundamentele informatie zit ingebed
als we over iemands identiteit praten. Eenzelfde probleemstelling had ik vorig
jaar aangaande de verweving van Spiral Dynamics met Ken Wilber’s 4 Culture
Quadrant. Mijn tekst binnen de toenmalige discussie op LinkedIn – vorig jaar augustus – luidde toen als volgt :</span></span><br />
<span class="mw-headline"><span style="color: purple;">
</span></span><br />
<div style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="color: purple;"><span style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span class="comment-body"><i>"Ik maakte zo juist een
tochtje door de morfische velden (Sheldrake), in de volksmond ook wel genoemd
"je fiets pakken en een ritje maken tussen de maïsvelden en weilanden
door". Net wilde ik voorzichtig enige reflectieve conclusies trekken
aangaande SD, toen me de "wetenschap" van ene Wilber – voornaam Ken
:-) – te binnen schoot. </i></span></span></span></div>
<span style="color: purple;">
<div style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span class="comment-body"><i><span style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">Als we
dan toch over de verschillende vMemen spreken, kunnen we naast "Wij"
en "Ik" ook nog wel "It" en "Its" eraan
toevoegen. Hoe doorkruist zijn "cultuur"-spiraal vanuit de
4-kwadrantenmodel tegen of dwars door die van Spiral Dynamics heen ? Rebellisch
als hij is ligt hij niet op de lijn van SD getuige zijn andere toegevoegde
invalshoeken. </span></i></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span class="comment-body"><i><span style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">Het
blijft ook dan natuurlijk de vraag in hoeverre deze spiralen enige analogie
vertonen, los van het karakteristieke spiraliserende ....</span></i></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<i><span style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span class="comment-body">Hebben we het nu over "evoluerende culturen"
(SD/Wilber) of een "indoctrinatie aangaande een cultuur" zoals ik dat
bij een grote organisatie bemerkte ?” </span></span></i><span style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: red; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">~~~~~~~~</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">Op
gelijke wijze trachtte ik nu de wetenschap van Gilles Deleuze inzichtelijk te
maken binnen de context van Riemann’s Zèta-functie. Een voorname stelling van Deleuze
is dat de identiteit het gevolg is van de verschillen die zijn opgetreden. Een
identiteitsverschil staat niet primair aan de basis voor andere verschillen.
Een identiteit ontstaat dus als gevolg van “<i>Difference</i>”,
het verschil. Als we dat dan terugplaatsen naar de Multiplicity van Rieman, zou
je kunnen zeggen dat – zoals het voorbeeld laat zien – een nieuwe laag wordt
toegevoegd. Terwijl er tevens een verschil is opgetreden. Tevens is er als
gevolg van de herhaling ook een verandering opgetreden in het aantal lagen. De
lagen zijn zowel kwalitatief als kwantitatief veranderd. We praten hier
voornamelijk in de metafysische sferen, alhoewel deze redenatie ook opgaat, als
we aan de genoemde aspecten fysio-biologische eenheden ophangen.</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">Als
we een identiteit toewijzen op basis van kwaliteit en kwantiteit van een
karakteristiek item zoals hier, dan kunnen we dus spreken over een bepaalde
identiteit. Met enige associatie kunnen we dit wellicht ook aantonen via de
meest door mij in mijn boeken toegepaste deling, namelijk 1 gedeeld door 7 of </span><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">1 : 7 = 0,142857 142857
(repetent).</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: red; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">~~~~~~~</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">We
kunnen deze analogie terugzien bij Gurdjeff´s enneagram+ steeds
doorlopen we de posities 1, 4, 2, 8, 5 en 7 en steeds komen we in een
andere laag, voegen we er een laag aan toe : "<i>Multiplicity</i>". De meerlagenheid die afstevent naar een mogelijk eindpunt.</span><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; line-height: 14pt;"><span style="font-size: 12px;">In dit laatste woord zit gelijk een onmogelijkheid, wat overeenkomstig de uitkomst van iemand's Zèta-functie is, 0 of wel "<i>impossible</i>"; </span></span><i style="line-height: 14pt;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: xx-small;">ζ</span></i><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; line-height: 14pt;"><span style="font-size: 12px;"> (s)
= 0. De Riemann-functie oogt vreemd, het lijkt een optelling, niets is
minder waar. Hij koppelt er namelijk meer dan 1 dimensie aan vast. De
uitkomst spiraliseert convergerend naar de 0-asymptoot. </span></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; line-height: 14pt;"><span style="font-size: 12px;">Van
een aantal medediscussieerders was deze uitleg ontoereikend om te
doorzien dat ik integrale semantico had toegepast met namen als Wilber,
McWhinney en Jung. Semantico - een niet bestaand woord an sich - houdt
een bepaalde wijze in, hoe je betekenissen van woorden kunt hanteren en
er waarden aan toe kunt toekennen.</span></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; line-height: 14pt;"><span style="font-size: 12px;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: #333333; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: purple;">In hoeverre kun jij wel de juiste associatie maken ? </span></span><span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;">Is
hier een opleiding voor of ontspruit het gewoon als een impliciete
order of is het een bepaalde kwaliteit binnen het spectrum van je
intelligentie ?</span></div>
<div style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;"> </span></div>
<div style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;"><span style="color: red;">(voorjaar 2012) </span></span></div>
</span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com5tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-66128961427257434282014-10-26T03:43:00.002-07:002015-11-08T06:51:31.266-08:00QUOTES ii<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
<o:RelyOnVML/>
<o:AllowPNG/>
</o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
<o:RelyOnVML/>
<o:AllowPNG/>
</o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]--><br />
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">"Free Will is the Space that is left over when your fate is filled up with Determinism." </span></i></span><br />
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:TrackMoves/>
<w:TrackFormatting/>
<w:HyphenationZone>21</w:HyphenationZone>
<w:PunctuationKerning/>
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:DoNotPromoteQF/>
<w:LidThemeOther>NL</w:LidThemeOther>
<w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian>
<w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
<w:DontGrowAutofit/>
<w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/>
<w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/>
<w:DontFlipMirrorIndents/>
<w:OverrideTableStyleHps/>
</w:Compatibility>
<m:mathPr>
<m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/>
<m:brkBin m:val="before"/>
<m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/>
<m:smallFrac m:val="off"/>
<m:dispDef/>
<m:lMargin m:val="0"/>
<m:rMargin m:val="0"/>
<m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/>
<m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/>
<m:intLim m:val="subSup"/>
<m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/>
</m:mathPr></w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true"
DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"
LatentStyleCount="267">
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" Name="Default Paragraph Font"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading"/>
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:Standaardtabel;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin-top:0cm;
mso-para-margin-right:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:10.0pt;
mso-para-margin-left:0cm;
line-height:115%;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
mso-ascii-font-family:Calibri;
mso-ascii-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-hansi-font-family:Calibri;
mso-hansi-theme-font:minor-latin;
mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">“Somebody asked me lately why so
few people noticed me. I replied that it's because I live in the future of so
many people."</span></i></span><br />
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">"Learning is unlimited. If limitations are proposed, the learning stops." </span></i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><span class="commentary"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">“Reality of one's own
identity is based upon all illusional identities outside one's own identity.”</span></i></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">“The Quantum Mechanics' String
Theory is synonymous to the Violin that plays the Universe's song; the
interchantee of energy and particle.”</span></i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">“Everything is energy ~ It is
even beyond Energy. Energy is a medium for the higher Codes. 'Energies' have
the magic potential feature ~ intelligence ~ to change into any dimension the
(implicated) order/code wants.”</span></i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><span class="usercontent"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">“PaY-Cu-nia = PaY-Cu-LIAR, so is War, 1 great Lie.
MoneY is meant for War not for Peace, because Peace kills Capitalism.”</span></i></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><span class="uficommentbody"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">"It's
the integral world (vicious circle) where Geniality meets In-Sanity." (and
where Geniality is In Sanity)</span></i></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">"The Strength of
SuperSpecial SpecificNess is that when it has reached this dimension of the
process it becomes a Universality."</span></i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">“IN-telligence
is not INside human, but outside, it is IN the UniVerse (Jung & Boltzmann).
Only the high sophisticated structures of an open mind allows INtelligence to
enter INside.”</span></i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><span class="uficommentbody"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">“So the aphorism 'emptY-headed NitWit' is correct; it
is about the available space in the head and mY-ne-d that allows the high rate
of INtelligence.”</span></i></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><span class="uficommentbody"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">“(the Quality of) INtelligence is 'unitarily' defined
by the outer unfolded structures of mind space INstead of the inner content,
the Mystery that embodies the Magic into Mythic actions through the Mind.”</span></i></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">"The product
of restricted 'thinking'~ thoughts is called the problem. The integral of
restricted perspectives is the silliness itself. </span><a href="https://www.facebook.com/hashtag/apprenti?source=feed_text&story_id=685222888225769"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; text-decoration: none; text-underline: none;"></span></a></i><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> If one's ambition is
to solve these problems, (s)he is not getting more intelligent. Intelligence is
about explicating more diamensionalities and its perspectives that results in
vanished problems (or so-called restrictions).”</span></i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; mso-margin-bottom-alt: auto; mso-margin-top-alt: auto;">
<span style="color: #674ea7;"><i style="mso-bidi-font-style: normal;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #7030a0; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">“Intellectuality as a full spectre
is nothing but a pluri-diamensional spatial order and constructured systemic
space of human, in which all energies fit when right tuning with an open mind.
The code beyond intelligence is this pluri-diamensional/layered spatial order
and constructured systemic space.</span></i></span><br />
<br />
<i><span style="color: #674ea7;"> </span></i></div>
<br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 11pt; line-height: 115%;"></span></span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-37446827965158455512014-10-25T12:59:00.002-07:002014-10-25T13:01:46.640-07:00QUOTES<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
<o:TargetScreenSize>800x600</o:TargetScreenSize>
</o:OfficeDocumentSettings>
</xml><![endif]--><span style="font-size: small;"><br /></span>
<!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:WordDocument>
<w:View>Normal</w:View>
<w:Zoom>0</w:Zoom>
<w:TrackMoves/>
<w:TrackFormatting/>
<w:HyphenationZone>21</w:HyphenationZone>
<w:PunctuationKerning/>
<w:ValidateAgainstSchemas/>
<w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>false</w:SaveIfXMLInvalid>
<w:IgnoreMixedContent>false</w:IgnoreMixedContent>
<w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>false</w:AlwaysShowPlaceholderText>
<w:DoNotPromoteQF/>
<w:LidThemeOther>NL</w:LidThemeOther>
<w:LidThemeAsian>X-NONE</w:LidThemeAsian>
<w:LidThemeComplexScript>X-NONE</w:LidThemeComplexScript>
<w:Compatibility>
<w:BreakWrappedTables/>
<w:SnapToGridInCell/>
<w:WrapTextWithPunct/>
<w:UseAsianBreakRules/>
<w:DontGrowAutofit/>
<w:SplitPgBreakAndParaMark/>
<w:EnableOpenTypeKerning/>
<w:DontFlipMirrorIndents/>
<w:OverrideTableStyleHps/>
</w:Compatibility>
<w:BrowserLevel>MicrosoftInternetExplorer4</w:BrowserLevel>
<m:mathPr>
<m:mathFont m:val="Cambria Math"/>
<m:brkBin m:val="before"/>
<m:brkBinSub m:val="--"/>
<m:smallFrac m:val="off"/>
<m:dispDef/>
<m:lMargin m:val="0"/>
<m:rMargin m:val="0"/>
<m:defJc m:val="centerGroup"/>
<m:wrapIndent m:val="1440"/>
<m:intLim m:val="subSup"/>
<m:naryLim m:val="undOvr"/>
</m:mathPr></w:WordDocument>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<w:LatentStyles DefLockedState="false" DefUnhideWhenUsed="true"
DefSemiHidden="true" DefQFormat="false" DefPriority="99"
LatentStyleCount="267">
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Normal"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="heading 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="9" QFormat="true" Name="heading 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 7"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 8"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" Name="toc 9"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="35" QFormat="true" Name="caption"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="10" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Title"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="0" Name="Default Paragraph Font"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="11" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtitle"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="22" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Strong"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="20" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="59" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Table Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Placeholder Text"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="1" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="No Spacing"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Revision"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="34" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="List Paragraph"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="29" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Quote"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="30" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Quote"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 1"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 2"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 3"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 4"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 5"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="60" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Shading Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="61" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="62" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Light Grid Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="63" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="64" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Shading 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="65" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="66" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium List 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="67" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 1 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="68" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 2 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="69" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Medium Grid 3 Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="70" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Dark List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="71" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Shading Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="72" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful List Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="73" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" Name="Colorful Grid Accent 6"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="19" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="21" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Emphasis"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="31" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Subtle Reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="32" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Intense Reference"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="33" SemiHidden="false"
UnhideWhenUsed="false" QFormat="true" Name="Book Title"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="37" Name="Bibliography"/>
<w:LsdException Locked="false" Priority="39" QFormat="true" Name="TOC Heading"/>
</w:LatentStyles>
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 10]>
<style>
/* Style Definitions */
table.MsoNormalTable
{mso-style-name:Standaardtabel;
mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0;
mso-tstyle-colband-size:0;
mso-style-noshow:yes;
mso-style-priority:99;
mso-style-parent:"";
mso-padding-alt:0cm 5.4pt 0cm 5.4pt;
mso-para-margin:0cm;
mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt;
mso-pagination:widow-orphan;
font-size:10.0pt;
font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
</style>
<![endif]-->
<br />
<div class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 200%; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: red; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">Scratch pad</span></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*<span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">The Mine-d is M-I-ne</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">H-Ear Y-Our H-Ear-Tick</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">Histrionic ~ Hysteria ~ History</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">Paranoia ~ Para-Knowia</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">* </span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">Schizophrenia ~ Scissor-Brainia</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">Schizoic ~ Auto-didactic </span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">Autism ~ Auto-Essence ~ self-fuelled</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">Anger ~ Eng ~ Fuel for the Eng-ine : Mahatma Gandhi</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">L-EyE-t for Y-Our Eye-s Only</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">L-EyE-t is called Light because of the lack of Mass
& Gravity</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">Rousseau ~ Rouge-Eau ~ Red Water ~ Blood ~ Sanguine</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">Spin-oz-A ~ Strengthen Y-Our Back-Bone</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">I 1-2 be Me</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">The Theo-ry is the Thea-ter of the Mine-D : David Bohm
et moì</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">Ethics ~ E-Thos ~ E-Theos ~ Manner of Go(o)d</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">The Voi-D is the Voi-Ce of all</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">Intelligence ~ En-Tele-cheia ~ Potential that is enclosed
(far away) </span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">Noospheria ~ Nous-Spheria ~ Our Wor-l-D</span></i></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;">
</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 12pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 7.1pt; text-align: left; text-indent: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";">*</span></span><span style="color: purple; font-size: small;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Wingdings 2";"><span style="-moz-font-feature-settings: normal; -moz-font-language-override: normal; font-family: "Times New Roman"; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif";">Ta-lent minus La-tent equals Va-lent</span></i></span></div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-59794448883492611072014-05-10T08:07:00.002-07:002014-05-11T05:15:48.100-07:00HighGiftedNess & Monism<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 0cm 5pt 3.1pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">From my latest book : “</span><a href="http://bit.ly/11gkOEN"><span style="color: red;">emergence of integrity</span></a><span style="color: purple;">”</span></span></span></div>
<div class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 0cm 5pt 3.1pt; text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="color: purple;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">When associating with Gottfried Leibniz, then Henri Bergson, Bernard Riemann and later Kazimiertz Dabrowski it is comprehensible that HighGiftedness can be related to Monism. </span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">
</span></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">HighGiftedness is a potential that can find its expression
and manifestation in complete different ways. In other words; it is a very
individual process where it all has to do with the whole or Holy spectre of Intelligence beneath the well known IQ. The word ‘<i>High</i>”
implies a state of mind that is higher than
what average people usually deal with in their own surroundings Where
E-Motions are the Motor of one's true development ~ based upon the
empirics of Henri Bergosn and Kazimiertz Dabrowski. </span></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><br />
</span><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span id="anonymous_element_22" style="font-size: small;">Within
this HighGiftedNess it is getting interesting when
these individuals are at the level of relativizing; putting aspects into
perspectives and handling these perspectives within lots of plexities;
Riemann's <i>'Zeta-function'</i>. Relativizing implies balancing (all possible) inner dualities with each other based upon
knowledge and experiences out of memory or sensory. At any issue or in any sitution a HighGifted individual is able to find a </span><span style="font-size: small;">complement or complementary dual for it. Herewith the issue or problem gets neutralized and together ~ as a created duality ~ it integrates up to a higher leveled value.<br /><br />The
tool that is the guarantee for this quality is one's high intelligence.
It evokes to fusing, merging or syntegrating any and all duals up to a
higher level; that's the emotion. The process repeats itself untill the
final transition up to complete freedom of the state of mind; a lack of
possible disbalances by one's inner emotions. This is the process of
individual concrescence; it is about the state of holy wholeness, about
individual integrity where the individual is the same as the
collectivum. It is living an emotional balanced life based upon the
strength of the integral intelligence. </span></span> <br /><br />
<span style="font-size: small;">This higher level I call Monism. This term was firstly introduced by Gottfried Leibniz. Monism implies experiencing the
world without dualities and so without polarities and~or contradictions.
Monism implies
also no convictions and no prejudices; it's about equivalence within 1
entity without hierarchy. It is the highest state of mind of monads;
living
the altruistic way. If you’re unknown with these esoteric aspects it
will be
hard to conclude this. That’s the cause of lots of misdiagnoses at
children and
adults within the Psychiatry who are already processing these aspects.</span></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="color: red;"><span style="font-size: small;">~~~~ The Explanation ~~~</span></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">Bergson used lots of the knowledge and wisdom of Leibniz. Being a physiologist, a neurologist, a psychologist and philosopher he was like no other person capable to understand in an integral way the unique characteristics based upon mainly the nervous system starting with the physical sympathic and parasympathic human systems. Later he extracted </span></span><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">out of this neuro-biological dimension</span></span></span></span>al aspects ~ his well-known "<i>SymPathy</i>"</span></span><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"> ~ and experimented with this within </span></span></span></span><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">psychological and philosophical dimensions</span></span></span></span>. </span></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">Dabrowski understood all this too and together with Science he introduced the term "<i>Positive Dis-Integration</i>", also within </span></span><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: small;">neuro-biological dimensions</span></span></span></span></span></span>, mainly related to our brain tissue. This </span></span></span><span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><span style="font-size: small;"><span class="short_text" id="result_box" lang="en"><span class="hps">sophisticated neural </span></span>dispersion emerges "<i>High-Sensivity</i>" or his "<i>Over-Excitabilities</i>". It is about positive fractalization. A higher stage of fractalization implies the possibility to resonate with higher frequencies beyond those of the average senses. It empowers the 6th sense; the intuition ~ Bergson's Sympathy ~ and the inner resonance with the first 5 senses. The fusion of seperate dimensions into a mono-dimension, a whole. The dimenisons are organized from physical or sensitive to mental to intellectual ~ thinking style ~ and finally spiritual level ~ existentialism ~ as the fifth one. According to Dabrowski this final level is the level of "<i>Altruism</i>" or "<i>Integrity</i>" that I call the level or mindset of Monism. </span></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><span style="font-size: small;">To Dabrowski emotion is no level, it is the essential driver or "<i>élan vital</i>" of Bergson's to develop and gain a next level. That is correct to me. It is the essential energetic never ending flow (lemniscate) that makes integrality of the intelligence ~ as a complete spectre (not just the so-called "<i>Direct Thinking</i>"/"<i>5 Senses Thinking</i>" or IQ as practiced by Carl Jung) ~ possible. It's mostly empowered by the imagination Thinking ~ Carl Jung ~ where Katherine Benziger categorized these individuals as "<i>Total-Brain-Types</i>". </span></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<span style="font-family: Verdana,sans-serif;"><span style="color: purple;"><span style="font-size: small;">This possiblity, this hidden potential is what HighGiftedness may imply.</span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 8.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"> </span></span></span></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
<div style="text-align: left;">
<br /></div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-51602207274437790492013-06-21T02:44:00.000-07:002013-06-21T02:56:52.549-07:00emergence of integrity ~ a Quintet (2)<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">From my latest book : “</span><a href="http://bit.ly/11gkOEN"><span style="color: red;">emergence of integrity</span></a><span style="color: purple;">”<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">If the proletarians ~ as Karl Marx suggested it ~
would have brought better social justice, every revolution is legal and allowed
in the most moral way. Then it is not discussable who leads the revolution. The
only reason an revolution is permitted or allowed if it is based upon the
highest moral grounds as mentioned. Every civil disobedience ~ no matter how
small or individual it is ~ is then morally and ethically “legal”.</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Considering Bergson and the idea that sympathizing
with similar species is easier than with others we may conclude that every
(sub-)culture imply “<i>the (energetic) law
of laziness</i>” what brings us to the open and closed morality. The risk that
is implied is the diversity of thoughts and actions. However there are only a
few ethical rules these so-called “<i>Closed
Morality</i>” organizations or communities loose contact with the outer world
and that implies that borders of these morality become stronger and more solid.
<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">The counterpart of ethics is free will as Immanuel
Kant mentioned it. What if free will is assimilated by the leader’s (free) will
? Where is the space that is left over in the way I started this chapter named
“<i>Quintet</i>” ? Can we still talk about
free will of the inhabitants in case of the question if the laws of survival ~
at the benefit of that specific community ~ still represent the same as the moral laws ?<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">“<i>Free will is
the Space that is left over when your Fate is filled up with Determinism.</i>”
~ </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 8.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">moì<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 8.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Note : Space is synonymous to the Gap as it guarantees
one’s Creativity</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Closed Morality has nothing to do with Democracy.
Democracy is best when its morality, its intellectual system is an open one.
Decisions based upon democratic majority isn’t democratic when it damages
nature, flora & fauna and even some human beings. The title of Bergson’s
book “<i>Creative Evolution</i>” may imply a
high welfare ~ a better social justice ~ for everyone. It is anyhow the way of
an open mind or attitude willing to improve in the ethical way. Originally that
was Bergson’s idealistic view, an open society. In that way Bergson shows us
that our Technocracy that is concrete and existing of matter, facts &
figures and money has nothing to do with the 2 processes “<i>intuiting</i>” and “<i>sympathizing</i>”,
because it is not characterized that way, it has completely different features.
As Schopenhauer said : <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">“<i>The highest
moral commandment is empathy.</i>”<i> <o:p></o:p></i></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 8.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Note : Empathy as an integral term for intuition and
sympathy empowered by imagination and language ~ moì<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">By the way, is this commandment just super(b)- or
supra-valid ? <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;">Evolution is a process in which the interpretation and
world views become different from the old ones. Is there a continuum in the
spiral or volvo, this rotation, in its direction of rotation ? Or do we have to
deal here with quantum leaps as well ? However the quality of one’s competences
concerning the 2 processes of intuiting and sympathizing may guarantee gaining
one’s authenticity; the characteristic actions and behavings become congruent
with your authenticity and your higher mission or purpose ~ teleologically
speaking; your personality represents your arche type. Maybe an e-volution is
to be changed into an in-volution; back to the source of all. The word “</span></span><i style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;">back</i><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif;"><span style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;">” </span><span style="font-size: 12px; line-height: 18.65625px;">doesn't</span><span style="font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;"> need to imply welfare
regressions; it’s only diminishing the intensity of welfare and the ambition. <o:p></o:p></span></span></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">What can we learn from this all ? The 2 processes of
intuiting and sympathizing are in all of us. So everyone has a capability to
develop the right intelligence and knows what decisions are instinctively made
and what in the right moral way. In the words of Chomsky every action is
allowed when individuals or groups damage social justice. In this context I
don’t mind if it is only about mankind him/herself, I include nature such as
flora & fauna as well. So in that way of speaking the technocracy is not
allowed to conquer natural phenomena by ignoring and even destroying them. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Referring to the 5 Chinese elements like earth/food,
fire/energy, air/life, water/flow and </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: Vrinda;">æ</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">ther/creation that
represent the quality of our lives. Does that mean that it is allowed to kill
the predator or perpetrator like Nero, Stalin, Hitler, Pol Pot, Idi Amin and
other less known persons who brought damage to these human rights ? According
to Hegel their actions were needed to contribute to human social progress in
their own way and suggested not to follow the majority if ethical rules are at
stake ? Do you know the quote : <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 8.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">“<i>Hate the sin
and love the sinner.”</i></span><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> ~ </span></i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 8.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">“<i>Cum dilectione hominum et odio vitiorum.”<o:p></o:p></i></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Originally it was quoted by St. Augustine and later
Mahatma or Mohandas Gandhi adopted it. People who represent these crimes against
humanity and nature must be stopped anyway as long as morality is respected.
Legality based upon hard rules and laws are to be overruled by ethical values.
So being integer means that you can’t be hurt and you won’t be capable hurting
or damaging other individuals, simply because you deal with their actions,
their sins and beyond those reflective behavings you try to heal this other
person; in a fully responsible ethical manner. </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">The essential question is “<i>what are the or only, are there limitations</i> ?” I don’t think it is
so hard to answer, there is just the only one as told by Schopenhauer.</span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: red; font-family: "MS Reference Sans Serif","sans-serif"; font-size: 14.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-16512276598061074242013-06-21T02:38:00.003-07:002013-06-22T02:56:08.773-07:00emergence of integrity ~ a Quintet (1)<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">From my latest book : “</span><a href="http://bit.ly/11gkOEN"><span style="color: red;">emergence of integrity</span></a><span style="color: purple;">”<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">“<i>The developing
of one is to be considered a vegetative, instinctive and rational life, 3
successive degrees and should not be seen as differences of intensity or degree
~ Aristotle ~ but as 3 different directions ~ Bergson !”<o:p></o:p></i></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;"> “More precisely
intelligence is before anything else, the faculty of relating one point of
space to another, one material object to another; it applies to all things, but
remains outside them.”<o:p></o:p></span></span></i></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">“A language is required which makes it possible to be always passing
from what is known to what is yet to be known.”</span><o:p></o:p></span></i></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Some psycho-sophers
that are gathered by me. What are the similarities of these famous 5 ?<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">When watching an
old debate about “<i>Human Nature</i>”
between Foucault and Chomsky ~ in </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 8.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">1971</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> ~ I recognized lots of analogy the way Steiner and
Jung discussed the way mankind and his or her way in developing consciousness.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 8.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">(http://bit.ly/11C58Ma)<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">The content of
Chomsky reminded me to Bergson’s book “<i>Creative
evolution</i>” although he used other terms and words. At first it is
important to realize what Bergson meant with instinct, intelligence, intuition
and sympathy. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">It appeared that it
would be easier to change 2 words into verbs in the use of processes, namely
intuition and sympathy into intuiting ~ introspective ~ and sympathizing ~ extraspective
characterized. </span></span><span style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;">Here the “normal”
words are instinct and intelligence. Since Bergson was a quite well educated
biologist, to him the great difference between flora and fauna was the word “</span><i style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;">mobility</i><span style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;">”. That’s also where we see the
difference between an animal and human; intelligence :”</span><i style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;">forms of (spatial) points that can be brought together</i><span style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;">”. In other
words</span><i style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;"> : ”the degree of solving potential
that distinguishes mankind above the animal, the primate</i><span style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;">”. This word he
used as a starting point for explaining the differences between instinct and
intelligence. Instinct implies a static reservoir of values that can be
consulted in a reflective way; it has often to do with survival and avoiding
pain and (any) damage. It needs no intelligence in a “</span><i style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;">mobile or dynamic way</i><span style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;">” of thinking but only an immediate acting;
the process of in-tuiting or consulting basic values.</span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Sympathy implies an
extraspective process; more precisely. Intelligence is, before anything else,
the faculty of relating one point of space to another, one material object to
another. It applies to all things, but remains outside them. Here Bergson used
explicitly and often the word “<i>faculty</i>”
in his book where I use the word “<i>intelligence</i>”
in my former books with its meaning being “<i>the</i>
<i>potential to be actualized</i>”. Although
sympathy may also rely on instinctive values ~ in a more emotional dimension
like e.g. pain and joy. Besides of these small exceptions it seems that
intuition and sympathy have their processes in opposite directions. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Also another addition
may be that knowledge ~ properly so called and reserved to pure intelligence ~
intuition may enable us to grasp what it is that intelligence fails to give us
and indicate the means of supplementing it. That’s why I proposed to consider
the intelligence as a spectre, where the intuition is the integral energetic
intelligence of all kind of intelligences. Please recognize the possibility to
empower general intelligence by intuition. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">Coming back to my introduction of the 4 plus one
psycho</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 8.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">~</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">sophers I refer to
Will McWhinney and also to Ken Wilber. Let me explain this to you. McWhinney we
know of his “<i>4 World Views</i>” in some
analogy with MBTI derived from Jung’s knowledge. Wilber we know about his 4
divisions as explained in my former books; we talked about plurality ~ “<i>Community</i>” ~ and singularity ~ “<i>Individuality</i>” ~ furthermore extended
into “W<i>e and Its</i>” and “<i>I and It</i>”. Foucault and Jung both
approach mankind from this collectivum ~ you even may say “<i>culture</i>” ~ where Steiner and Chomsky approach mankind from this
individuation ~ you may say “<i>individual
identity</i>”. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">There are more similarities to discover between these
5 individuals as being shown in the picture beneath. (available in the book)<i><o:p></o:p></i></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">At Bergson I show the openness of both instinct and
intelligence. In a way both are reachable in the relationship with the outer
world. Where instinct is mostly (bio-) “<i>material</i>”
orientated and shows a kind of solid and intelligence more “<i>form</i>” orientated is that is more
flexible and dynamic. It’s not specifically the form that determines the
creation, it is its limitations around, the surroundings that assure the
uniqueness of each creation of each unique individual.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">The left side of the picture represents the
objectivity, while the right side the subjectivity. The tool that Foucault and
Chomsky use is called “<i>language</i>” and
Jung and Steiner use “<i>imagination</i>”.
However, if we take the opposite directions of the 4 factors “<i>I”, “We”, “It” </i>and <i>“Its</i>”, “<i>I</i>” gets exchanged
with “<i>It</i>” and “<i>We</i>” gets exchanged by “<i>Its</i>”.
<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">In a way instinct has nothing to do with both
consciousness and creativity. As I see it they are synonyms of each other.
Where instinct requires immediate reflective actions intelligence has to deal
with gaps. Jung and Foucault claim that these gaps are the space between
several perhaps noo-spherial “networks”, which imply that the outer world is
responsible and accountable for one’s intelligence. Steiner and Chomsky claim
that our bio-mechanical structures and their restrictions in it initiate some
kind progress coming out of ourselves. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Steiner uses the process of imagination and Chomsky
uses the process of language. Anyway all talk about leaps to be made in their
own process of thinking. The bridge to other dimensions may explicate after
integrating ? new orders, where ~ according to David Bohm called them ~ the
restrictions of mankind guarantee certain creativity and-or consciousness ~ the
implicate orders.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<span style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;">As we put it in the political way we might admit that
we have no influence in our political landscape. We depend on the ones that we
have chosen. If that is so then what is our personal power ? Chomsky explains
it as follows. The Government confronts us with legality. If legality is our
human nature, then we don’t need our instinct including the ethical values.
Every civilian is allowed to obstruct legality if (s)he thinks it doesn't lead
to better justice; justice meaning a better social life for everyone. As
individual this is, it is applicable to the battle of the classes. </span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;">End of part 1</span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-53675032992606124672013-06-20T06:30:00.003-07:002013-06-20T06:30:31.350-07:00Debt & Penance : Hannah Arendt<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="color: purple; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">From my latest book “</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><a href="http://bit.ly/18IKdsV"><span style="color: red;">Debt en Penance</span></a></span><span style="color: purple;">”.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">To
me as a psycho</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 8.0pt;">~</span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: purple;">sopher
Hannah Arendt is one of the most interesting persons in this book, especially
by the term “<i>Animal Laborans”.</i> Originally
the word “<i>animal</i>” is a being with a
spirit. </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Although
“<i>Animal Laborans</i>” implies a working
human being from a higher purpose politics are part of that. Most philosophers
talk about the “<i>reason</i>” that arises
the human mind. Perhaps “<i>reason</i>” is one
of the 3 mental dimensions or constructures, introduced by Jean Gebser by using
language regarding Descartes’ triptych “<i>1-perceptions~
2-mental experiences~ 3-realizing perceptions (reasoning)</i>”.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">In
association with Marx’ “<i>sub- & supra</i>”
classes I recognize here an analogous structure. At first the division between
individuals who think they have to work day-in-day-out ~ the sub class ~ and
those who think they don’t in a certain way ~ supra class. Does the image of a
hard working individual really originate from the Church ~ regarding e.g. the
Dutch Calvinist culture ? Where Protestantism is more a self-manifesting
attitude and the Calvinism is strongly based upon sober life and hardworking,
both as a response against the wealthy Catholic Church.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">The
other division is where Arendt talks about striving for a mystical experience
with a higher power with intellectual love and a philosophical reconciliation
there exists a small group of individuals who can and lots of people who won’t
be capable to achieve this state of mind, as a transcendental process. They
deal with the religion as preached here on earth. The second division implies
to me that we talk about some kind of intelligences. The word <i>“intelligence</i>” actually means “<i>actualizing of a potential</i>” as I
composed it from the Greek language. I talk about a spectre of lots of intelligences.
“<i>Reasoning</i>” is one of them. The words
“<i>intelligence, integrity and integrality</i>”
are within the same energy spectre that implies that they (can) interfere with
each other. While the term “<i>integer</i>”
means or implies “<i>undamaged/unhurt/healed
entity</i>” the intelligence has an important role in this process, so a lack
of some intelligence makes the integral result of this integrity incomplete.
The individual is not integer for that moment. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Today
reasoning is often confused with logical dialogues. Logical dialogues are about
the content of causality and possible determinism; the world of facts &
figures, rules & control. Talking about reasoning when someone enters the
public domain like civil servants do without controlling their reasoning, then
they won’t be able to deal with the facts and reality that is desired ~
pragmatically speaking like Voltaire meant. Hannah Arendt proposes that
individuals who do anyway, survive and make small or even huge mistakes are not
accountable for their decisions. These deeds are only banalities. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">She
mainly pointed with this remark to Adolf Hitler and the Nazi’s during her job as
a reporter in “<i>The New </i>Yorker”,
phrased by her quote “<i>The greatest evils
in this world are committed by nobody’s” ~ </i>referring to her defensive
reports about Adolf Eichmann. About Eichmann she said : ”<i>The alarming to the person Eichmann was surely this man was neither
perverse nor sadistic. This normality that was worse than all the horrors of
WW-II together”</i>. The banality of the evil caused an enormous controversy
among her audience and the Jewish society. Is this a kind of “<i>Anger-History</i>” (see also Max Weber)? <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">How
can we deal with this views of points of Arendt during this crisis ? Isn’t
there a kind of invisible hand from the financial world that makes Ministers
follow, in return they make their civil servants follow them ? Can we really
make the Ministers, civil servants and small bankers responsible for all
activations that emerges from this crisis ? That the recovering of the economic
system now is done based upon facts & figures and ignores all what has to
do with human values ? <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Are
“<i>animalia laborantes</i>” nonchalant or
“mentally lazy” in a way while they do not choose to compete in the debates
with civil servants and ministers anymore ? Is this an evolutionary “<i>easy-lay-down</i>” or an tricky “<i>comfortably-numb</i>” state of mind created
by smooth talking people ? So if all banalities are evil and are attained by
nobodies, are these nobodies not simply yourselves ? Is this state of
comfortably-numb a restriction of mankind within decisiveness or a limited use
of intelligence in order to create higher consciousness and the will to
identify yourselves ? Now that others have tried and done can they be blamed
they did it their way ? Isn’t it so that the leader you become, is the leader
you deserve ?</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: purple;">That
is why this new Youthful Election System ~ YES* ~ is so valuable; from a
younger age mankind is stimulated to reflect and identify him/herself in the
community, enlarging this “area” while growing up. The results can be
transposed in choosing the right individuals with whose ambitions and ethical
values you can cope with ~ identify with. Everybody can according to Hannah
Arendt. This election system implies also that individually s-electing “<i>soulmates</i>” can be done every moment of
the year. The cycle of 4 years is bypassed with this dynamic election
possibility. What do you think about the duration of 4 years ?</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 8.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Note afterwards : Is it strange that there are so many
followers and only a few leaders ? Regarding it in an esoteric way ~ “<i>as huge as tiny</i>” ~ where the milky ways
and solar systems represent nations and communities and they present some
spiral dimensions like we know in our DNA. How many galaxies exist with how
many leading more or less concentric stars and with how many planets and moons
in their orbits around these stars and act like human “<i>animalia laborantes</i>”?</span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com2tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-26795170017694712552013-06-20T06:00:00.003-07:002016-01-29T02:29:15.577-08:00Debt & Penance : Benedictus Spinoza<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="color: purple; font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">From my latest book “</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background-color: white; font-family: "arial" , sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><a href="http://bit.ly/18IKdsV"><span style="color: red;">Debt <span style="font-family: "arial" , sans-serif;">&</span> Penance</span></a></span><span style="color: purple;">”.</span><br />
<span style="color: purple;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<br />
<span style="color: purple;"><i><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">“All
excellent things are difficult as they are rare as well</span></i><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">.”<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: purple;">“<i>How
else than possible it is that salvation could be accepted in the most easy way
without too much effort, and anyhow it is neglected by so many people ?”<o:p></o:p></i></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><i><br /></i></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">That’s what Spinoza said at the end of his
“<i>Ethica</i>”. The public disquiet Spinoza
caused was mainly based upon his view of God. His visions were more based upon
a neutral monistic conception of some God. God was no Creator of the world, the
world was part of a divine creation. Miracles are no proof of the existence of a
divine power; it is the nescience of mankind. He based it upon the duality of
religions dealing with “<i>good and evil</i>”.
In the way Thomas de Acquino interpreted it that evil was the absence of the Go(o)d.
<i><o:p></o:p></i></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Regarding Hannah Arendt I discover lots of
similarities with her points of view. In her quote “<i>The greatest evils in this world are committed by nobody’s</i>” there
is this analogy as Spinoza and De Acquino meant. As we don’t know the causes of
our actions, then we deal with free will, for Spinoza however the effects were
the results of nescience. Nescience is the biggest obstacle for the ambition of
a virtuous life ~ non-egoism. The transition from passivity into activity is
always overwhelming, liberating and joyful. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">For Spinoza the virtue is not avoiding evil
actions based upon fear because of some penance or because of hope for its
reward. Happiness is no reward of the virtue; the virtue it is itself ~
Aristotle. By living that way we experience joy. If mankind acknowledges its
being as a part of nature, of the universe and consequently subjected to the
relevant laws, then (s)he would stop trying to explain the world in human terms
and views ~ the so-called “<i>anthropo-centrism</i>”.
“<i>Ethics</i>” ~ “<i>Ethos</i>” (Gr) ~ <i>“Etheos</i>” ~ ”<i>E-Theos</i>” – (out of the) manner or habit of
God ~ has a scathing criticism of all forms of anthropo-centrism and finalism,
which implies that nature services mankind. So “<i>Ethica</i>” truly is about morality, ethics and behaviorism and the way
to gain happiness. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">He is convinced this routing exists, but
for mankind hard to go. Mostly it has to do with the unilateral way of life
nowadays; the world of data, facts and figures. All based upon the 5 senses ~
physio-biological or physio-mechanical. The world of dissonance while the 6<sup>th</sup>
sense ~ intuition ~ is about the resonance ~ energetically speaking. The
analytical world with its 2 perculations within Autism; Paranoia and
Schizophrenia ~ not willing or capable dealing with and integrating the
information from the associative world. Enforced by the drive for power &
control as an example of 2 mental mechanisms.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Who
imagines to be unable to achieve something, won’t do it and that results into inability
~ “<i>trying = doing</i>”. Not the objects
determine the power of passion, it’s the experience, the transition into the
subjectivity ~ Spinoza’s “<i>de imaginatio”
– </i>“<i>Ethica</i>”<i>. </i>Imagination is a necessary and indispensable part of the
acknowledge-process, but only produces chaotic and coincidental and therefore
confused knowledge for the individual itself. So “d<i>e imaginatio</i>” is restricted, partial and subjective. As Carl Jung
told us in his “<i>Red Book</i>” (a quote) :
“<i>For Jung, the initial irruption of
psychic disturbances that he later came to describe as a result of a process of
“active imagination” were more traumatic than constructive</i>.”<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">To
me imagination is ~ like dreams are as well ~ an important process in the way
of supporting and empowering one’s intuition; it carries personal value in it ~
empathy & sympathy. Like a new and free born baby that doesn’t know good or
evil as dual terms. Every duality is based upon subjectivity, upon a general
point of view ~ let’s say in a democratic way a point of acceptance. Especially
these processes of generalization makes that people are not stimulated to
think, imagine and reflect for themselves, and more specific concerning money
and morality, “<b><i>debt and penance</i></b>”.</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: purple;">Do
you have debts and do you feel you are to be punished for now ?<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<span style="color: purple; font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;">This
chapter was written by me as a tribute to Spinoza and the book itself.</span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-27793110645357375002013-06-20T05:56:00.006-07:002013-06-20T05:57:44.168-07:00Debt & Penance : Ayn Rand<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="color: purple; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">From my latest book “</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><a href="http://bit.ly/18IKdsV"><span style="color: red;">Debt en Penance</span></a></span><span style="color: purple;">”.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">A first impression ~ reading Ayn Rand ~ might be that
she was a victim of the Communistic system, the system where free thinking and
acting were forbidden for the average civilian according to this dictatorship.
Everything was pointed out and settled ~ dictated ~ by the Government. The
controlling power was even harder. Although this kind of Socialism would imply
equality for every civilian it didn’t work afterwards. You may consider it as a
closed morality, where values and cultural expressions are not tolerated than
that they represent the mind-set of the authorities of the dictatorship. </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">The motor of the
economics does also move as a way of speaking, it is statically a machine with one
speed without any excessive ac- or de-celerations. Any enterprising individual
with some ambition is to be overruled, because that may be successful and
therefore a risk to the system. So we deal with a strong social dependence without
any authenticity or self-reliance. Everything has been taken care of by the
Government so that implies obligations backwards, namely unconditional
ad-diction. What we see is the obstructed way of self-development, to gain one’s
own identity by free research. life and expressions. So the Government is
selfish, so its civilians are as a reflect on it. <o:p></o:p></span></span><br />
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Because you can’t
read it from the faces who can be trusted Rand tells us that selfishness arises
above all, rationally speaking. That’s what she means with self-reliance. The
meaning of selfishness is close to egoism ~ I do agree ~ although it indeed has
a lot to do with integrity and intelligence as Rand claims too. As long as
selfishness is based upon integrity that can be controlled by reason, then it is
alright and the right way to live your life. That is what freedom is to her and
thereby free interactions and communications between individuals are not to be
disturbed but only guaranteed by the Government. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">It is in a way a
little peculiar that although the social system as the Communism equalizes all
people Ayn Rand assumes that all people are capable to do so ~ self-development
~ which means that all people are more or less equal and have the same talent
and competences to achieve this. Despite the fact that it isn’t of course so
she doesn’t want the Government to interfere with no one at all. As I consider
it that way then the selfishness of Rand is an egoism in the way we commonly
use the term in our society.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Is self-identification
part of the process Rand is pointing at and is rational selfishness synonymous
to self-consciousness ? Reading Nicolaas van Cusa he suggested that there is a
higher state of mind above the common sense of mankind. According to him it was
“<i>reason</i>”, while the process is called
“<i>reasoning</i>”. Of course reasoning is
more than debating. Interactions with the environments facilitates this process
and may even empower that. The product is “<i>rationality</i>”
~ Aristotle ~ where the individual has found an inner balance between cognitive
and intuitive skills. As long this balance can be disturbed by its environment,
there is no integrity within the inner and with the outer dimensions. <o:p></o:p></span></span><br />
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">These processes of
identifying is of course dangerous for some Governments. Unskilled ~ read
self-unidentified individuals ~ can be easily influenced and seduced by some
comfort. The ability for influence implies dependence and dependent people are
sensitive to “<i>debt & penance</i>”. As
long a diversity of mankind is guaranteed in this world these phenomena like a
financial crisis exist. Advocating for self-identification by Rand is too
simple in expecting that it really is going to happen. <o:p></o:p></span></span><br />
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Almost half the
amount of all people live in or relate life to a passed mode, about a third of
the amount do that concerning the present mode and a small amount has a
progressive or future temperament of thinking. The first mentioned group ~ “<i>Animalia laborantes</i>” ? ~ is the one of
uncertainty, you may say. Their passed is the most certain aspect. They even
prefer a bad certain future as long is it is as certain as their passed life
periods. It’s like preferring bad sympathy above no sympathy, that’s part of
human nature, captured by uncertainty.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Even in that way
ignoring people and exploiting them in an evil way like cheating and manipulating
them imply egoism, it has nothing to do with solidarity, integrity and
altruism. Self-reliance is important to Rand and that is a hard job because
self-empowerment is applicable when you finished your identification. Where
self-reliance implies integrity in the activities of actualizing; egoism has
always been (too) easy.</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
</div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">So integrity
doesn’t know and won’t pander to a financial crisis. A financial crisis only
exists for them who deal with money, who need to use money for happiness, where
Aristotle suggested that for happiness “reasoning” and “<i>virtue</i>” are the 2 necessary components for happiness. How happy are
you ? </span><i><o:p></o:p></i></span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-70547802327035048572013-06-20T05:53:00.005-07:002013-06-20T05:53:58.107-07:00Debt & Penance : Voltaire<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="color: purple; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">From my latest book “</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background-color: white; font-family: Arial, sans-serif; font-size: 10pt;"><a href="http://bit.ly/18IKdsV"><span style="color: red;">Debt en Penance</span></a></span><span style="color: purple;">”.<o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: purple;">Voltaire
is indeed well-known by the Enlightenment. Of course peace is part of it.
Enlightenment is getting integer, loosen personal matter, convictions and all
pre-judgments. Gaining peace implies that there’s a (potential) quarrel, a
fight or even a war. The battle for the world was very topical then in a way of
global trade ~ e.g. the Dutch V.O.C. ~ <i>Vereenigd
Oost-Indische Compagnie</i>” ~ with their fleet. It may be that Amsterdam had
world’s first trade center in those days. I do not know if Voltaire based his
quote upon the battles for matter as we know at South America. Lots of natives
were murdered because of the invasion, whether for the Christian religion
whether for the greed for gold. This plundering ~ of course ~ had nothing to do
with fair trade. </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">During
the life of Voltaire the battle of religions had been ended within Europe. So the
evaluation of religion was the most important topic within the new world of
philosophy. While religions appear to be incapable to deal with respect
regarding cultures Voltaire saw that trade could. It is like “<i>Homo Ludens</i>”. What happens that happens.
It is based upon “<i>Égalité & Fraternité</i>”.
No need for power and-or control during that game. So every means or
intermediary has the same state of the game, meaning money has no overvalue
considering the game, it is part of that game. Small debates and quarrels are
part of that game. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">While
the interests grew and so their responsibilities and accountabilities money
became a higher value. As long as we deal with physical and concrete products
and services during a short time, then the problems were not serious than
within that context. As simple it was that when the salary wasn’t to be paid,
the work wasn’t done. That is of course in exclusive situations as we already saw
it during the Medieval and the building of lots of cathedrals by mainly the </span><span lang="EN-US" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;">Freemasonry</span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"> through
Europe in that period. Experience has to be paid for. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">So
when trading had still physical dimensions ~ multiplicity ~ so had money. The
change was when money became a trade product of itself. Not as long as it
concerned just an interest rate. Because an interest rate could be as physical
as possible, even as a natural product. The problems started when promises were
made which couldn’t be fulfilled. It is like a self-producing system. Regard it
as a MEI-constructure from the Chaos Theory; it needs Matter, Energy and
Information. “Ancient” or original trade consisted of those 3, nowadays money
mostly is based upon energy and information. Numbers & figures and big
accounts that are stored in computers, that tell that the value of money will
grow based upon expectations. Do you really get what you see </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">? <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Making money is now based upon expectations, based
upon statistics, chances and promises. What about the probability ? It may be
that your chances grow but the current situation of our systems make it
improbable. That’s the subjective aspect of making money. All other aspects are
based upon objective aspects, facts & numbers created by computers. So is
it right that we have peace by trade ? Voltaire was right then. Nowadays trade
means paranoia, suspicion, fights and even war talking about basic elements for
life like food and (fossil) energy. Even trade itself means war, indeed trade
means income nowadays. The way multinationals supported by Governments deal
with trade is only focused on making more money or grasping for it. And when it
is not available, they invent debt constructures, which create dependence.
Dependence means control in a situation that control is more preferred that
penance. </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">So trade used to guarantee peace then, does it still today
?</span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">
</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-11469419130730126102013-06-20T05:50:00.004-07:002013-06-20T05:50:35.810-07:00Debt & Penance : Stanley Milgram<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">From my latest book "</span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Arial","sans-serif"; font-size: 10.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><a href="http://bit.ly/18IKdsV"><span style="color: red;">Debt en Penance</span></a></span><span style="color: purple;">”.</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple;"><i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">“If man should decide to erect a Nazi concentration camp in today’s
America, then the deployment would be no problem at all.</span></i><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">”<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">Why this appendix ? If you just had the opportunity to
read Hannah Arendt, it is not so strange that Stanley </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: purple;">Milgram popped up.
Milgram was just like Skinner famous because of his social experiments
concerning the human behavings under extreme circumstances. One of these
experiments concerns the obedience of a leader and his or her follower. How far
~ under how much psychological pressure ~ will individuals go to obey, no
matter how much harm and damage (s)he causes at other individuals as a part of
the task of this obedience process ? </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">These
individuals were questioned, wrong answers were punished by putting an electric
shock to other individuals starting with lower ~ non-lethal ~ levels that was
told to them at the start. The respondents experienced ~ heard ~ the pain that
these shocks generated by the victims in the other room although the victims
were actually acting and feigning these pain expressions.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">The
research was about authority and influence of the so-called leader or master
and the level the psychological restrictions of the follower concerning
obedience combined with the ethical values. His conclusion was pretty shocking
to him; about 80 % of the respondents followed and obeyed their master till the
lethal level of the victim.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">Another
experiment was about 4 groups of one hundred already addressed letters, which
he lost by purpose. The potential recipients were 2 famous institutes, the
other 2 were addressed as “</span><i><span lang="EN-US" style="background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">Friends of the Nazi
Party</span></i><span lang="EN-US" style="background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;">" and "<i>Friends of the Communist Party</i>”. About a
quarter of the last 2 groups were posted afterwards ~ all to his own postal box.
Of course it is obvious that it is important that the circumstances are known
as well. What is the demographic composition, what are the cultures and
subcultures and what was the mind-set at that time ? <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Last aspects influent
and determine also the results of such experiments. However Milgram
demonstrated that while the observer is not observed or perceived by the
“to-be-observed” the answers are more representative than when anyone would
have asked such questions in case of face-2-face interviews. Think about <i>“the cat of Erwin Schrödinger</i>”.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">The content of these 2
chapters ~ Hannah Arendt & Stanley Milgram ~ empower each other. They show
us that ethical restrictions can and will be crossed when it is about
individual benefit; a kind of unconditional sympathy for a leader no matter
what the damage is that was caused by the decision being a follower or not.
That’s Arendt’s story about Adolf Eichmann. It’s again about acknowledging bad
sympathy to the one you know and no sympathy for someone you don’t. While ~ as
mentioned ~ the psychological pressure was enormous for making that choice during
the first experiment. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Self-survival ~ “<i>élan vital</i>” arises all and crosses
almost all barricades and-or restrictions. Call it mass-hysteria dealing with
the big names in history, where the dependent and histrionic aspects of mankind
were activated till the level of hysteria as described. Where love and
affection turned into hatred and evil.</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: purple;">Does true altruism allow you to prevent you
to reach that stage of mind-set like the Christian world knows in the personification
of Jesus ?</span></span><span lang="EN-US"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-14117980485868254502013-03-16T02:32:00.001-07:002016-08-15T07:09:14.708-07:00Maxwell's daemon (2)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="line-height: 14pt;"><span style="color: red;">Irreversable energies or another power ? </span></span><br />
<i style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><br /></span></i><i style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">"How is it possible that we approach these dimensions
of energy in our way as we do it now as I described above ? The energies that
we can practice in a deductive way as given in the examples ?”</span></i><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">As a matter of fact every kind of
warmth may have its own dimension and so are not congruent to each other. Warmth
that has been generated by a magnetron is of some other order than warmth produced by the flame of gas. In
both examples the 1<sup>st</sup> Law of Thermo Dynamics is applicable in the
way of the conservation of energy. The <span style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif";">2</span>nd Law tells us that energy will return
to its maximum entropy or the highest grade of disorder. You might ask yourself
the question which state that is; ist that for sure an what the temperature
would be in that case. What order of the chaos would that possibly be ?<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Does that imply a complete stagnation
in full random order like maximum disorder by extracting all (warmth) energy or
does the complete stagnation around the absolute zero point ~ 0 Kelvin ~ imply
the lowest possible order and possibly destinated cristallization at solid
matter based upon the Forms of Plato ? What if the highest order of entropy is achieved
by feeding energies until the highest possibly achievable temperatures, so that
the warmth energy and entropy are maimal (plasmatic state) ? Is there a
difference by Thermo Dynamics in talking about hot fires, while the Esotery
also talks about the 7 fires of human ~ Héléna Blavatsky), where human being
was emerged out the cold version of fire, “<i>the
Divine Spark” </i>? What is it exactly ? <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">What is it again what makes this
warmth extracts from this emptiness and her unspoken and undefined energies or
is this synonymous to the universal expansion from the Big Bang ? Does the Big
Bang represent a certain warmth of energy, that is capable to achieve the
dynamics in life, because we as human beings cross the dynamics of the Big Bang
in a random and unique personal way ? The moment that dualities emerge and
because of that they represent a higher level of order of entropy until the
moment we blow out our final breath ? <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">Suppose we consider the expansion of
the Universe from the Big Bang as a specific dimensional dynamics, then you
might say that apparently no human being is able to follow these dynamics. The
real life can be considered as a power or potential symbolized as vector “<i>1</i>”, connected to the vector “<i>Zero</i>”. These 2 vectors create together a
certain “<i>effectivity</i>” or “<i>rate of target</i>” symbolized by cosinus </span><span style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">φ</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">. The
other part of your life, the reactive or imaginary one, what can be symbolized
by sinus </span><span style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">φ</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"> in respect to vector “<i>Zero</i>”. Every aberration within your life ~ represented by the part
symbolized with sinus </span><span style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">φ</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"> is your unconscious part of your authenticity, that
needs to be cleared. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">Afterwards the result of this process
of consciousness is life that is 100 per cent aligned with vector <i>“Zero</i>”, symbolized by cosinus </span><span style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">φ</span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"> =
1, When the results of your life vectors are completely aligned with vector <i>“Zero</i>”, then you do not have to anything
anymore, you go with the flow, the “<i>Panta
Rhei</i>” of Life. Do realize that your vector of life is no straight line
~think about my illustration of the Riemann spiral ~ while vector <i>“Zero</i>” represents “<i>nothing-and-all</i>”.</span><span style="color: purple;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; color: purple; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">Finally
in this part about Maxwell you might have the question if manifesting is
synonymous to “<i>living your life</i>”, and
the 2<sup>nd</sup> question may be if the “<i>effectivity</i>”
or “<i>rate of target</i>” represent the
competition between human beings or does
it represent the monadic aspect, gaining the state of “only-<i>to-be</i>”?</span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-28714994933335589632013-03-16T02:26:00.000-07:002013-03-24T04:31:09.091-07:00Maxwell's daemon (1)<span style="background-color: white; color: red; line-height: 14pt;">Irreversable energies or another power ?</span><br />
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">The daemon has a lot to do with the 1<sup>st</sup>
and 2<sup>nd</sup> Law of the Thermo Dynamics ? At 1 hand I recognize James
Maxwell of his 4 equations within the phenomenn of Electro-Magnetism ~ EM.
Besides of that it remembers me of Laplace. Like Immanuel Kant did Pierre-Simon
Laplace mentioned the word “<i>dae-mon</i>”
and meant with that a higher mythical intelligence concerning the constructures
of the Universe. Laplace’s “<i>Nebular
Hypothesis</i>”. Originally the meaning of the word “<i>dae-mon</i>” in Greek is a neutral goddess, who simply represents a higher
intelligence. Laplace only emphasized that any human wouldn't be capable to create
such a macro structure like the cosmos or Universe. </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">At that time Maxwell was besides
these EM phenomena also dealing with research of Thermo Dynamics. He suggested
there was something that could measure the speed of molecules, based upon their
absorpted warmth or heating power. This something was capable ~ “<i>supplied labor</i>” ~ to separate these
molecules that differed in speed. This resulted in 1 room with a higher ~ the
high-speed molecules ~ and another room with a lower temperature ~ the
low-speed molecules. William Thomson 0r Lord Kelvin named Maxwell’s “<i>something</i>” for the first time “<i>a dae-mon</i>”, because what happened was
the contrary of what the 2<sup>nd</sup> Law of Thermo Dynamics claimed. Indeed
this law tells us that warmth can be transisted into labor. In a way here
happened the opposite process.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin: 6pt 3.1pt 5pt 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">When we consider our energy conform
earthal understandings, then we find out that about 40 per cent is really
labor. Horse Power ~ HP ~ or mechanical power, named ex-ergy. All residual
energy is called “<i>an-ergy</i>”, what
low-valued warmth represents. These specific ratios we find back in e.g.
Combined Heat Power (CHP). It is almost impossible to gain more labor out of
the anergy. </span></span><span style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;">With an added system called “</span><i style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;">Organic Ranking Cycle</i><span style="color: #cc0000; line-height: 14pt;">” ~ ORC ~ it is
possible to gain about 25 per cent of dispersed labor out of the warmth.
Totally the efficiency of labor will be 7 till 8 per cent higher out of energy.</span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">This
approach within the Energy Techology is analogue to the names that are given to
these powers. The input energy is called “<i>Apparent
Power</i>”, labor is called “<i>Real Power</i>”
and the warmth is called “<i>Reactive Power</i>”.
I consider this in relationship with the electro-magnetical phenomena. Within
the Control Technology the Laplace transformations are used to deal with these
components in a mathematical way, such as “<i>real
& imaginary aspects</i>”. These 2 components can be considered as 2
vectors, which have an included angle of 90 degrees in between. Within the
Mechanics and Electronics the ratio between these 2 vectors is called “<i>effectivity</i>” or “<i>rate of target</i>” symbolized by cosinus </span><span style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: NL;">φ</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">.
Our reality with respect to the phenomenon.</span></span><br />
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><br /></span></span>
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; color: purple; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">As far as it concerns the transition between labor and warmth a irrational transition appears to be in a similar way at potential and kinetic energy. What makes that the transition between the 2 energies with separate kind of dimensions to each other and back to its original ? The potential energy is represented by E</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 8.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">p</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> = m.g and the kinetic energy is represented by E</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 8.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;">k</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"> = ½ m.v<sup>2</sup>. It all looks so straightforward this transition, so logical and simple, that 1 kind of energy transists into another kind of energy, based upon the 1<sup>st</sup> Law of Thermo Dynamics regarding “<i>The conservation of Energy</i>”. Is this really true ? Is there some daemon here that forces this all ?</span></span></span><br />
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><br /></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background: white; font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">~~~
end of part 1~~~ </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-2416352255146343642013-03-12T06:03:00.002-07:002013-03-12T06:09:41.063-07:00Modern religions (3)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: red;">Naturalistic Panentheism</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">So life not only seeks survival, but it is an increase
in the intensity of its enjoyment. In short the more capable an organism is of
perceiving and expressing truth – “<i>Religious
Self</i>” – goodness – “<i>Ethical Self</i>”
– and beauty – “<i>Esthetical Self</i>”, the
more evolved it is when I consider the trinity according to Kierkegaard again. The
desire to move forward the end of heightened experience is described by Whitehead
as an adventure of ideas. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Within those ideas God is understood to be the original
creature of Creativity, its primordinal non-temporal accident. “<i>Creativity is the universal of universals
characterizing ultimate matter of fact – embodiment or “human being” – and also
that ultimate notion of the highest generality at the base of actuality – intelligence
vs consciousness</i>.“ God perpetually unifies the ongoing cosmic process by
providing the initial aims and perceiving the final results of the concrescence
of all finite creatures, including the universe itself. Our experience of moral
ideas – our conscience – is the experience of the deity of the Universe. Although
these moral ideas have such a high generality, it is so close to our inner Self,
the ethical way differs so often very strong from each other. Where Tony Blair
claims that the socio-political power of the religion is the most important
issue for every country in the 21<sup>st</sup> century, then inter-religious
dialogue ought to be our civilization most pressing concern. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">According to Whitehead there is no civilization here
on earth that can continue its adventure in rationality absent a vigorous
expression of the human sense of sacredness. So religions are not the answer,
it’s the respect to each expression of religion, that is inherent to its
culture. That’s the mythical way of conjoining Ego and Self. To discover this Mythical
way is an individual process, an individuation – Jung & Steiner – in the
right way by self reflection. Afterwards it can finally lead to this
collectivum as Esotery shows us; as small as grand. So focussing on the way of getting
there is useless, you have to keep up the main stream like panentheism shows. That
is the specific and unique way for each of us, because it is as general as it
can be. It’s the wholeness of emptiness, this truth is empty because of the
right synthesis of all that we are dealing with ghere on earth.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">So nobody
within any other culture is capable to order the other individuals how this
mythical way ought to be. Each specification for expression this religious way
to contribute to their higher power is as unique and as general as it is. This
means that at the other hand all religions here on earth – Christianity, Islam or
Buddhism and others – will claim to know walking this ultimate path to spiritual
love and freedom. </span></span><br />
<div>
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><span style="color: purple;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div>
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-US;"><span style="color: purple;">As long as we respect each other. That is the beauty of
cultures, that is the beauty of religions and that may be the beauty to follow
your own heart in freedom. At least if we allow the other individuals to become
part of this higher collectivum, Panentheism shows us, no matter what name you
give the Mythic way – Planet, the place where it happens and determines how. And it’s about the Magic in each of us – People and it
now is a matter of the right Mentality that will lead to our award and success –
Profit.</span></span></div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-53694420245030310972013-03-12T03:12:00.001-07:002013-03-12T03:22:18.877-07:00Modern religions (2)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="color: red;">Naturalistic Panentheism</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">The fact that so many philosophers struggle about
several dimensions of duality means that the truth is beyond all this earthal wisdom.
In the part of this chapter “<i>Mental</i>”
has a complete other meaning than within the Psychiatric Cure. <i>“Self</i>” implies the direct interaction
with “<i>Magic</i>”, more or less to be
identified as your Arche Type on earth, “<i>Soul</i>”
implies the <i>“Mythical</i>” process
between Self and Ego, while Ego implies the “<i>Mental</i>” intelligence. This mental intelligence – the potential to
actualize – includes all spectre of intelligence. Mental capability implies the
consciousness that all has to collaborate, the mythical way should be aligned to
the way you are bounded with your Self. Where nowadays Ego was disconnected
from Self and Soul at so many people. A
religion without the bounding with the magic. While Re-Ligion essently
represent the boundness of life with the Magic. Or as Whitehead says :<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: red;">“<i>Religion is an
ultimate craving to infuse into the insistent particularity of emotion that
non-temporal generality which primarily belongs to the conceptual thought alone</i>”
and :<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: red;">“<i>The 2 sides of
the human organism require a reconciliation in which emotional experiences
illustrate a conceptual justification and conceptual experiences find an
emotional illustration.</i>”</span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">The 2 sides relate to the role of Philosophy and its
necessity for developing a close relationship with Religion, otherwise it is
psychologically speaking ineffectual. When Religion does not appeal to
Philopsophy, then it would sink into emotional tedium. Reconsidering <span class="mw-headline">Søren Kierkegaard</span> it is clear what he meant with his “R<i>eligional Self</i>”. The level of
existentionism, where the individual has the highest level of consciousness in
what his purpose is here on earth – teleological. The mythical process being
perceived and conserving the boundness – Religion – with the 1 and only thruth.
A belief without any condition. And from Kierkegaard we can understand
Dabrowski’s “<i>Emotion as the Motor for
true individual Development</i>” from the 2 quotes of Whitehead. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">That’s what High Giftedness really means :<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: red;">“<i>The talent to
actualize one’s potential without denying the Source, Its Love and Goodness,
expressed by pure altruistic behavings here on earth.</i>”</span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">This boundness to the truth doesn’t need doctrines and
dogmas, as we deal with here on this planet. This is the power of the Void, the
Emptiness concerning interests and convictions at the level of lots of people.
That’s why we - High Gifted People – see
and realize that all religions all together are never capable to bring Gaea and
its inhabitants into a transcendent process, unless we reconsider Religion in
broader way : “<i>The Naturalistic
Panentheism</i>”. That human in his Universum is so much smaller than any
microbe here on earth. In what way does the hubris of human make him think he
can control his future on the planet ? <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">According to Whitehead the new view on Philosophy may
attain a chief importance when religion and science fuse into 1 scheme of
thoughts. Humanity’s sense of the numinous and transcendent of something beyond
the material, or not quite consistent with it – is what distinguishes us from
other primates. Human beings have the capability to get conscious, have the
tool – the spectre of Intelligence – to do so. We are not only wise, but also
the uncanny species. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Where eg Hitchens claims that cosmic inflation only
suggests a dead universe, whose random and fleeting order is destined to evaporate
into nothing, for a panentheist like Whitehead is the expansion of the universe
the first meaning of “<i>organism</i>”. For
him it’s about “<i>God & Creativity</i>”
which implies that Darwin’s evolutionary theory is non-teleological and so
incomplete. Whitehead’s evolutionary cosmology – besides avoiding the
bifurcation of nature into organic and an-organic, attributes the experience of
“<i> enjoyment</i>” to all enduring forms of
orders that arise amidst the cosmic process. That’s in a way what The Gaea
Hypothesis tells us : “<i>Gaea – earth – as an
organic part of the organic universe, where the universe is part of God and God
is all.</i>” </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB;"><span style="color: purple;">~~~ end of part 2
~~~</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-39506398687646708162013-03-12T02:57:00.002-07:002016-08-20T02:07:35.406-07:00Modern religions (1)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="color: red;">Naturalistic Panentheism</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: purple;">A famous trinity you may know are the 3 P’s, which
represent “<i>People. Planet & Profit</i>”.
In a way I thought about another similar trinity; the 3 M’s.These M’s represent
“<i>Magic</i>”, “<i>Mythic</i>” and “<i>Mental</i>”. As
I wrote, where the first word “<i>Magic</i>”
implies 1 dimension, “<i>Mythic</i>” 2
dimensions and the adiectivum “<i>Mental</i>”
3 dimensions, corresponding with the divine spark, the process into human and
the way human is dealing with it. </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">When I associate further on, then “<i>Magic</i>” has to do with the spirit, the
highest Truth, 1 unit as the Void or the connection between the 2. The culture
of a tribe or now our western society has demythicated almost completely life
by all science. Where culture used to be the mythical way to create the right
religion, that gives manifestation and expression to the Magic of all
individuals within each collectivum or community. Nowadays Mythic is reified to
facts and matter; the embodiment of phenomena. So the last part, the
consequence of “<i>Magic</i>” and “<i>Mythic</i>” is “<i>Mental”</i> in a 3-dimensional way. Although I admit that this word
only includes still “<i>body</i>” without “<i>Soul</i>”. Our world ihas become one without
passion, acting without “<i>heart & soul</i>”
and no more capable to make the right decisions but those that are releated to
earthal interests. A way of processing the magic into daily life as a
demythicated religion.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Although I write this book in a strong psychological
way, maybe that’s the reason I have to refer to other aspects, when I talk
about the word “<i>mental</i>”. It is very
often assumed that – like Descartes – human is a duality : “<i>body and mind</i>”. Descartes was 1 of the
first persons, who claimed that the mind was a non-physical substance and was to
be identified it with consciousness and self-consciousness. The word “<i>mind</i>” is as specifically and as
generally possible to be interpret. However, when I associate this to Jean
Gebser’s interpretation about the 3 dimensions of “<i>mental</i>”, then this implies another interpretation of <i>“mind</i>”. Where “<i>Mythic</i>” implies the 2 dimensions of the human concept of “<i>Space & Time</i>”, is “<i>Mind</i>” related to 3 dimensions namely <i>“Self, Soul and Ego</i>”. This is in
accordance with the “<i>Roberto Assagioli’s
Egg Diagram</i>”, Assagioli is well-known as the fouder of Psycho-Synthesis. In
its view of the human personality Psychosythesis also had a model to describe
its disparate and multi-faceted nature.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Mental constructions are built up by these 3
dimensions within human. A kind of integral constructures by interactions
between the 3 dimensions of </span><i style="color: #cc0000;">“Self, Soul
and Ego</i><span style="color: #cc0000;">”. To be regarded by the dimensions within duality as I already
described in my second book “</span><i><a href="http://bit.ly/RAIZXB"><span style="color: red;">Anthroposofic energy</span></a></i><span style="color: #cc0000;">“ :<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 14.2pt; text-indent: 0cm;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "symbol"; font-size: 9.0pt;">·<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><!--[endif]--><u><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">Interactionic Dualism</span></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"> : Mental states like desires and convictions are
causally speaking bounded with physical situations. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 14.2pt; text-indent: 0cm;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "symbol"; font-size: 9.0pt;">·<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><!--[endif]--><u><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">Psycho-Physical
Parallellism</span></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"> : Body and Mind do not
interact and do not influence each other causally. However represented by
Leibniz as an ontologic monic that there’s
only 1 fundamental substance as the source of all in the Universe.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 14.2pt; text-indent: 0cm;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "symbol"; font-size: 9.0pt;">·<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><!--[endif]--><u><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">Occasionalism</span></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"> : This is the conviction that the so-called causal
connections between physical and mental relations don’t exist. The
interventions are attributed to the actions of a higher power. In a earlier
chapter I already wrote about “<i>Causality
vs. Synchronicity</i>”. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 14.2pt; text-indent: 0cm;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "symbol"; font-size: 9.0pt;">·<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal;">
</span></span><!--[endif]--><u><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">Epiphenomenalism</span></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"> : It says that
mental phenomena have no potential to be a cause for physical events.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div align="left" class="ParagraphX" style="line-height: 14pt; margin-left: 14.2pt; text-indent: 0cm;">
<!--[if !supportLists]--><span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "symbol"; font-size: 9.0pt;">·<span style="font-family: "times new roman"; font-size: 7pt; line-height: normal;"> </span></span><u style="line-height: 14pt; text-indent: 0cm;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">Emergentism</span></u><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt; text-indent: 0cm;"> : When matter is organized in a proper way mental
characteristics emerge. These emerging characteristics have a independent
ontological fundamental principle; the combination of autopoiesis and
concrescence.</span></span></div>
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><br /></span>
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><br /></span>
<span style="color: purple;">~~~ end of part 1 ~~~</span></span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com1tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-65807661750070725522013-03-08T02:45:00.002-08:002016-01-25T03:12:50.354-08:00Gaea Hypothesis<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="color: red;">Extinction
of a high intelligent species</span><br />
<div style="background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; line-height: 14pt; margin: 4.8pt 0cm 6pt;">
<span style="color: purple; font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;"><br /></span></div>
<div style="background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; line-height: 14pt; margin: 4.8pt 0cm 6pt;">
<span style="color: purple; font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;">In
our drive to compete God humanity has made great progress what I may call our
state of Technocracy as a concept of our Democracy. Politicians who do not
understand have their choices been determined upon scientists and economists,
whose purposes are to prove how things work and how it could be even better –
competing God. This in not only related to matter and mechanisation, it extends
to life, as if the magic of life and its divine spark can be replaced by, yes
what ? Gaea is known as the mythical goddess of the earth and nowadays it is a
kind of religion that considers “</span><i style="color: purple; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;">Earth</i><span style="color: purple; font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;">” and its habitants as 1 organ
within an organic system as our cosmos represents itself within the whole.</span></div>
<div style="background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; line-height: 14pt; margin: 4.8pt 0cm 6pt;">
<span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;">The
Gaea hypothesis, theory or principle of James Lovelock proposes that organisms
interact with their inorganic surroundings on earth to form a self-regulating
complex system, contributes to maintaining the conditions for life on the
planet. Topics of interests include how the biosphere and the evolution of life
forms affect the stability of global conditional circumstances such as the
climate and other environmental variables that effect the habitability on
earth. When I consider this Gaea history, then we see some important aspects,
first the term “</span><i style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;">Holocene epoch</i><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;">”. The Holocene epoch means that a great
number of species were extinct by nature with more or less cosmic influences.
Holocene is to be specified as we think about what human is doing now; more
technocratizing the world at the cost of flora and fauna. Within some years
even lots of human species and perhaps all. That’s the stage we’re in now.</span><span class="apple-converted-space" style="color: #cc0000; font-family: "verdana" , sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;"> </span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: #cc0000;">As you may know science is based upon “<i>to
ensure the unsureness or increase the grade of sureness by diminishing the
unsureness</i>.” So it’s about the process, the “<i>how</i>”-question.<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span> Science is about Technocracy,
where “<i>technè</i>” is Greek for the combination of meaning beyond “<i>art,
skills, product & competence</i>” – a kind of syneaeresis or an intuitive
simultaneously perceptively understanding of these 4 terms. Once Albert Einstein
remarked : “<i>God isn’t throwing dice</i>”. Meaning that the cosmos as a high
ordered structure could not be emerged out of chance or coincidence. The
information beyond this cosmic con-structure wears its purpose – future – in
it. Gaea – “<i>Earth</i>” – is part of this ever changing structure into new
ones. Bruno Latour is 1 of the sociologist-philosophers, who elaborated this
whole concept about Gaea :</span><br />
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span>
<span lang="EN-GB" style="color: red; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: red;">“<i>By 2016, the world’s geologists will
officially decide whether or not Earth has entered a new geological epoch, the<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><span style="border: none windowtext 1.0pt; mso-border-alt: none windowtext 0cm; padding: 0cm;">Anthropogenic</span>. From
Latour’s non-modern perspective, neither “nature” nor “society” can enter this
new epoch unscathed. “The theater of Modern history has been destroyed and must
be re-constructed from scratch”. Gone is the passive stage, “nature,” upon
which the actors, “rational animals,” have for so long waged their wars and
signed their peace treaties. The Anthropos is no longer<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></i><i style="outline: 0px;"><span style="border: 1pt none windowtext; font-style: normal; padding: 0cm;">in</span></i><span class="apple-converted-space"><i> </i></span><i>nature, nor<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></i><i style="outline: 0px;"><span style="border: 1pt none windowtext; font-style: normal; padding: 0cm;">outside of</span></i><span class="apple-converted-space"><i> </i></span><i>nature. Latour heralds the
coming of an entirely new kind of political animal, a novel form of political
body. They are a people to come, the people of Gaea, agents of an impatient
<span style="background-color: white;">planet</span></i><span style="background-color: white;">.”</span></span><span style="background-color: white;"><span class="apple-converted-space"> </span><span style="color: #cc0000;"> </span></span></span><span style="color: purple;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">(summary by</span> </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: purple; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><a href="http://footnotes2plato.com/"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Matthew</span> <span style="color: #cc0000;">Segall</span></a><span style="color: #cc0000;">)</span></span></span><br />
<br />
<span style="color: purple;"><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: purple; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">How is it that so many different people
feel what life, earth and a living planet mean and so few people don’t
really care ? Is it possible that we step over to another planet when this one
is washed, polluted and exhausted ? If Planet Earth has a purpose within the
Universe, then is it possible that human is allowed to destroy this one ? Is
that part of this purpose or
is that too simple to admit
and so drop our responsibility ? The highest law of the Universe is that is
recovers itself. It will re-evoke its power of self-regulation and
self-morphogenesis, with or without the human race. So in a way we do have a
choice, that’s our free will, simply because we are spiritual beings.<span class="apple-converted-space"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="color: #c00000; font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"> </span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-size: 13.5pt;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<br /></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-66223810762548723322013-03-07T04:45:00.001-08:002013-03-07T04:53:58.474-08:00Action & Brain Type<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="color: red;">Physical & Metaphysical
sporting aspects</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="color: purple;">During my life as a sports
trainer and coach since my 16<sup>th</sup> year, it appeared that training at
the lowest level was mostly involved with the physical an physiological aspects
of the apprentice or student. Of course the necessary aspects of Didactics and
Pedagogy were to be integrated in the all over skills of any trainer. Being highly
qualified as a sports trainer & coach the main aspect within my training
programs is the psychological approach. How is that acceptable ?</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Before I was introduced into
the method of “<i>Myers Briggs Type
Indicator</i>”, I had sufficient knowledge and experience of all disciplines
although more fragmentatedly approached. If I regard the content of this book
of mine, I thought that it might be recommendable, if it really works what I am
writing. Yes I does. I did lots of research in the backgrounds of MBTI, where
it came from and what other research results proved why MBTI could also be
associated with Brain & Action Type. MBTI is based upon Carl Jung’s
philosophy of duality within the human being. Mainly Jung relied on his principles
of the energy duality of “<i>Introversion
& Extraversion</i>”. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Normally speaking interaction
and intercommunication can only be both energies, no doubt about it, while Jung
was talking about energies, that can be considered in an everlasting looping,
continuingly exchanging directions – intro vs. extra. Earlier I compared this
process in relation with bio-chemical elements within someone’s system (no one
ever proved or disproved it yet). Where introversion is related to the Oxidator
within the Tabel of Chemical Substances by Mendeljev and extraversion may be
related to the prominent biochemical activities of Reductants. Where this table
contains 9 main groups to complete nature’s content ?<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Based upon dualities of Jung’s
Katherine Benziger showed the world that preferred behavings were to be appointed
to highly energy concentrated brain activities, the 4 divisions of the brain.
With this information other dualities were located in the brain; based upon the
research of the Myers-Briggs family. With simple terms : front left implies “<i>logical thinking</i>”, front right implies “<i>intuitive perception</i>”, back left implies
“<i>sensory perception</i>” and back right
implies “<i>social thinking</i>”. Further on
they discovered combinations of this divisions. Firstly Benziger categorized
people because of 1 partial, 2-, 3- and total (4) brain types. MBTI elaborated
this knowledge into 4 categorizes and called these thinking styles : “<i>Artisan-Guardian-Rationalist-Idealist</i>”,
the so-called “4 <i>Brain Types</i>”. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">So here we have specified the
preferred brain activities, that result in certain behavings including the
physical activities. Within the sporting world Bertrand Théraulaz and Ralph
Hippolyte discovered the relation between each brain type and the activities,
that were specifically different according to each brain type of the player. So
the way of thinking was in correlation with the way of moving. They called that
aspect “<i>Action Type</i>”. Together with
my good friend Jan Huijbers – writer of the Dutch version of the book “<i>Totaalcoachen met Action Type</i>” (together
with Peter Murphy) </span></span><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 12px;">– </span><span style="color: #cc0000; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;">I expored the game of Action Type more deeply. So now, I look
in the face and eyes of sporting individuals, observe their anatomy and motor
skills. I listen to the choices of words and style of sentences. Thereby I know
in 2 ways their thinking style and their preferred learning style as Kolb does
in his own way.</span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="color: purple;">A simple story as I tell it
here to you. Is it sufficient ? No, it isn’t, because MBTI can’t tell the whole
story. It does not describe the communication processes like Will McWhinney
does with his “<i>The 4 World Views</i>”.
These 4 world views of Will matches about 85 % with the 4 brain types of MBTI. It
also doesn’t tell much about the way the decisions are to be made,
energetically speaking like the bodygraph of “<i>Human Design</i>”. It doesn’t tell the kind of Intelligence and the
related level, such as Dabrowski’s “<i>Emotion
as the motor of one’s individual development</i>” at e.g. High Gifted children and
people. And so there exist lots of different methods to profile individuals mostly
focussed on the will to predict people decisions and actions. Why should you ?
I don’t. I leave it up to one’s own “<i>Autopoiesis
& Concrescence</i>”. All that I do it facilitate my players in the team. </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-55133485294678716102013-03-07T01:00:00.001-08:002013-03-07T02:04:16.784-08:00Ecology & Economy<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="background-color: white; color: red;">The power of changing
letters</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: purple;">My last book had the title <i>“From Nomad upto Monad</i>”. By exchanging
the 2 consonants the word changes of course. But in essence, does the meaning
of the word change in a extreme way ? No, it does not. Phonetically the words sound
almost the same. So do the words in the title of this chapter. So is it right
that ecology and economy almost mean the same ?</span></span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">In earlier blogs I
described several aspects within the Chaos Theory, efficiency is an important
word within this theory. The word “<i>economy</i>”
has also a lot to do with the word “<i>efficiency</i>”.
Considering complex adaptive systems as dissipative structures – energically
open systems – then it is obvious that these kind of systems find their own new
order from the so-called chaos. When this new order complies to higher
efficiency, then the stream of matter, energy and information keeps on going
that way, in those loopings of that certain part of network. In a way this new
order is not predictable, because it finds out by itself : “<i>auto-poiesis & morpho-genesis</i>”; it’s
the implicate order. Described in a biological-mechanistic way. The physical
way as the opposite of the metaphysical way; “<i>concrescence</i>”. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">The term “<i>Ecology</i>” – mostly related to the biological version of nature,
unfortunately the term “<i>Economy</i>” – is
strongly related to money nowadays. So the criterion for efficiency is related
to money. Neglecting and ignoring all aspects that lie beyond it. The real qualia
of whatever being reduced and transformed into the criterion called “<i>money</i>”. Efficiency is about nature,
about pureness, emerging from structures, that are no longer effective anymore.
What I mean is that effectiveness is synonymous to the word “<i>functionality</i>” – the reason to be alive
and the unique essence to survive. This unique essence is based upon the
combination of “<i>Form & Function</i>”,
where Form or Constructure represents the biological part and the function in a
way the psychological part in relationship with Teleology, what is linked to
the process of gaining consciousness. It manifests itself as described. In case
of human being I talked about the 2 integral processes; autopoiesis and
concrescence, leading to transcendence. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">So it seems to be right that
human being has the capability to think, to create and generate, that’s pure
and awesome. The real Artisan – Artist, how close are these 2 words related ? –
works from other criterions than those related to money. Posing deadlines for
perfecting creations can be based upon financial criterions, but that has to do
with financial dependence, nothing less. Every amateur – its Amor or Love for
the activity – is based upon the nature and intrinsic motivation. Where this
motivation is highly congruent with someone's meaning of life. The way of gaining
this purpose for life is related to the thinking style, the temperament and anatomy. That
means pure Passion, the road of the heart to reach that.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="background-color: white;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">And so I talk about nature, I
talk about the micro-Ecology of human, surrounded by the macro-Ecology, the
cosmic nature. If it seems that this relation – esoterically speaking – is so clear,
why would we disturbe this balance ? If there is a balance within the whole
universe, then it has to be economical as well, because nature & cosmos are
self regulating – morpho-genesis – structures, that are influenced by the whole
itself, not by a criterion as money, made up by man. Money is the tool to avoid
frustration when having no control of your life and those of other people. The secondary
product this process creates is Paranoia and-or Jealousy. </span></span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="color: purple;">Money is used for greed, eager for power & control , to
demand the right to do with nature as man likes to. Destroying flora and fauna
for own benefits, while all the money in the world can’t buy animal species,
that were extincted because of man's activities during the last decennia. So what has money to
do with the economical structure of our Ecology ? Is our Economy really representing
our Ecology ? <o:p></o:p></span></span><span style="font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: purple;">If you deeply understand these 2 words, then you
do not have to worry about (human) sustainability anymore.</span></span></div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-28086228222732649262013-03-03T10:28:00.000-08:002013-03-04T00:41:09.574-08:00Systasis & Synaeresis (final)<span style="color: red;">The integral structure of the consciousness</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">In a way it is clear
to experience that the divine spark – the magic of life – leads to the mythical
way of dealing with the dualities of and in life. Mostly experienced as
polarities because of all personal prejudgements, interests and convictions of
human beings. From some points of view I talk about a divergence of the magical
germ, that is convicted to walk this road trying to convergent through
someone’s life back to the source; Riemann’s Zèta-function, i.e. spiraling
cycles converting to the absolute asymptote of the void’s. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">One of these
processes is autopoiesis in a way similar to Dabrowski’s “<i>Positive
Disintegration</i>” of the brain issue at High Gifted and High Sensitive people,
what makes their minds more capable to accept energies of other dimensions,
that is necessary beneath the process of concrescence. The so-called “<i>Body-&-Mind</i>”-duality (Descartes) only
in a way as meant with the term “<i>synergy</i>”.<o:p></o:p></span></span><br />
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">To have more
understanding why Gebser introduced “<i>systasis
& synaeresis</i>” is to make it more clear how the process of individual
transcendence proceeds. As I consider the word “<i>mind</i>” it should be brought into a broader perspective, because I
associate it to the several kinds of intelligence within its spectre. The
complete integral intelligence – intelligence as the empowerment to actualize individual
potential – may induce the highest level of consciousness, experiencing the
magic of life as a human being (transcending upto higher levels). That is a
synergetic game of all that is representing a human being and its surroundings during life.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">The mental aspects
in a 3 dimensional constructures – Gebser – implies more or less the knowledge
or in a more scientific way what it is and because of the 3 dimensions it means
that duality can be dropped in the way thesis and anti-thesis induce a synthesis
what attains both dualities in life – the 2 dimensional mythical aspect of how
to deal with dualities – and become one or more congruent with his/her source,
the monadic style of living, the synthesis of all dualities, “<i>matter & energy</i>“ included. <o:p></o:p></span></span><br />
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">So
during the mythical stage the 2 terms of systatis and synaeresis are really
important, because your whole life is about perception and interpretation and
your aim of what to do with it and what you cab do with it (teleologically
speaking). The synergy within the processes of individuation and collectivum
what also 1 entity at the end, 1 monad representing. The level of being an
observer without being or taking part of the observed, where individuation and
collectivum are 1 whole.</span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><span style="color: purple;">Remembering Jung’s 2 structure world within
dualilty of consciousness and unconsciousness conjoining into 1 integral consciousness
by interacting and intercommunicating – you may see it as a extension of the
structure of the consciousness – while Steiner and Gebser take a starting point
from 1 simple structure with several dimensions and intensities or modalities
such as the more physical – autopoiesis – and the metaphystical – concrescence –
dimensions, translated into the synergetic process of transcendence. </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><span style="color: purple;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><span style="color: purple;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><span style="background-color: white; color: purple; font-size: 11.818181991577148px; line-height: 18.664772033691406px;">(re-sourcing : </span><a href="http://bit.ly/WFZXY4" style="background-color: white; color: #7d181e; font-size: 11.818181991577148px; line-height: 18.664772033691406px; text-decoration: none;"><span style="color: purple;">Matthew Segall</span></a><span style="background-color: white; color: purple; font-size: 11.818181991577148px; line-height: 18.664772033691406px;">) </span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com3tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-53857055679186938482013-03-02T06:09:00.001-08:002013-03-02T06:10:19.326-08:00Systasis & Synaeresis (2)<span style="color: red;">The integral structure of the consciousness</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Earlier I explained the difference of visions
betwee<span style="background-color: white;">n Carl Jung and Rudolf Steiner. Whereas Jung dealt with 2 worlds –
conscious/personal and unconscious/shadow – Steiner based it upon one source
with several dimensions and structures, so does Jean Gebser :<o:p></o:p></span></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; line-height: 14pt;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: red;">“<i>There is no so-called
unconsciousness. There are only various modalities (or intensities) of
consciousness; a one-dimensional <span style="background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;">magical</span>, a two-dimensional <span style="background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;">mythical</span> and a three-dimensional <span style="background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial;">mental</span> consciousness. And
there will also be an integral four-dimensional consciousness of the whole</i>.”
</span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; line-height: 14pt;">
<span lang="EN-GB" style="background-color: white; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><br /></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><span style="color: #cc0000;"><span style="background-color: white;">A modality is synonymous to a dimension, some kind
of structure with its own specific functionality, as far as I read it in his
description. In this way I read the word “<i>synergy</i>”.
Synergy emerges when several energies cristalize, whereas they have the
functionality to contribute to the continuity or survival of the organism or
system. Reconsidering the term “<i>autopoiesis</i>”,
can I mean here a network of constructures or is this too mechanical, too physio-biological
? Events of energies as cristalizations may not be considered as networks in
the way the Chaos Theory does. Because there is no matter in this flow beneath energy
and information. </span><o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">So it is more than clear that transcendence to
higher levels of your consciousness is an integral activity, activating each
part within the spectre of Intelligence to gain higher levels of consciouseness
and because of the activation new functionalities exply, unfold implicated
orders (Bohm). Otherwise it is another expression for the human unique talent out
of its potential. Perhaps integration isn’t even a sufficiently powerful word;
maybe induction is. I even may neglect them both and focus on the term “<i>transcending</i>” to a higher level of
consciousness.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">So gathering the knowledge of systasis, synaeresis
and synergy, I conclude that esoterically speaking, synergy emerges at each
level, in a microscopic and in a macroscopic world. Even free of precondions
when we regard the energetic dimensions. This possibilitity exists also –
according to me – within the spectre of intelligence. This implies that the
result or product of synergetic activities are new orders, more simplex and
less complex, more translucent and less troubled views. Transcendence as a process
or unique activities by the skills of actualization – synergy – emerging out of
potential, embedded in the whole Spectre of Intelligence with the final result of
the most simplex structure of consciousness. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">So Gebser says :<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<i><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><span style="color: red;">“Synaeresis fulfills the a-perspectival integrative perception of
systasis and system and is a precondition for diaphany, which is able to be
realized when, in addition tot systasis and system – the symbol with its
mythical effectivity – and magic symbiosis are included, that is to say,
present.”</span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><o:p></o:p></span></span></i></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><span style="color: red;">Note : </span><i><span style="color: red;">“Integral
& Individual” = integredividual (moì) or integrative</span><span style="color: #cc0000;"><o:p></o:p></span></i></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Varely and Whitehead display a clear understanding
of the need for a synaeretic mode of perception that breaks free of spatial categories
and systematization endemic to the mental structure. The related processes or constructurization
of autopoiesis and concrescence bring together each of the new structures or orders of consciousness. </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="background-color: white; color: purple; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt; line-height: 14pt;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="background-color: white; background-position: initial initial; background-repeat: initial initial; font-family: Verdana, sans-serif; font-size: 9pt;"><span style="color: purple;">~~~ end of part 2 ~~~</span></span><span style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: NL; mso-bidi-font-family: Arial;"><o:p></o:p></span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-3443195075905080962013-03-02T03:56:00.005-08:002016-01-27T02:18:51.167-08:00Systasis & Synaeresis (1)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="color: red;">The integral structure of the consciousness</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: purple;">By trying to exemplify the transparency and
wholeness – typifying the integral structure of consciousness – Jean Gebser
introduces 2 terms : “<i>systasis</i>”,
meaning “<i>the conjoining or fitting together
of parts into integrality</i>” and <i>“synaeresis</i>”
– “<i>the conjoining or fitting together of
2 seperate perceptions within the same unity</i>”. This and more you may read in my newest book.</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">The wholeness is the integral level of your
consciousness, where e.g. kind of perception bring the higher, integral interpretation.
That’s the world of “<i>All-and-Nothing</i>”, according to Dabrowski level #5, according to Spiral Dynamics’ level of “<i>Coral Red</i>”, corresponding with #9, which
represents the wholesness of the process of Healing – Gurdjeff´s &
Ouspensky’s enneagram. It’s therefor impossible contemplating these 2 words separately.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Viewing an organism as a special kind of system
that excludes no subjectivity and thereby no emotions. Systasis grants the
parts of a system a transparency, allowing the organism to be understood as a
subject perpetually becoming whole. This is – according to Jean Gebser – a
remarkable difference with the definition of a system in a generally speaking. The
system that represents “<i>The Individual
and introspective Autopoiesis transcending into or together with the Collectivum
and extraspective Concrescence</i>” is the integral and a integrative conjunction.
<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">This what systatis means to me in a broader way. When
I compare systasis with autopoiesis, then it looks – by the word ”<i>part</i>” – that systasis is more objective,
a more composing process by parts from outside into the borders of e new, integral
system, while autopoiesis is working from inside out based upon self-(auto-)reproduction
from a view of networking, whereas autopoiesis looks more organic, more
subjective and so even more emotionally driven. So that’s why I like to say it
is composing 2 different “systems” which transcendent to a higher integral
level of consciousness.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">How do I integrate the word “<i>synaeresis</i>” in this description ? Basically the meaning of the word
is simply : “<i>perceiving in a new way
after 2 seperately being perceived objects/subjects/parts have conjoined
(systasis)</i>”. Phonetically let’s take the example of the letters <i>“p</i>” and the <i>”h</i>”, pronounced as “<i>pi</i>”
and “<i>aadg</i>” after conjoining them into
–ph-, “<i>phi</i>” is heard. Instantly I can
not find out if this phenomenon – “<i>synaeresis</i>“
– is appointed to 1 dimension of perception, in this example “t<i>he audibility”</i>. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="color: #cc0000;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">Is this a kind of prove that human is unable to
define a phenomenon by 1, 2 or perhaps a combination of 3 dimensions of
perception tools ? Is this where lays the power of intuition within </span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">:</span><span class="apple-converted-space"><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"> </span></span></span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">“<i>touch – matter” /
“smell/taste – molecule/ion” / “hear – vibrating molecules” – “see – frequency”
/ “intuition – resonance”</i> ? Is intuition or sympathy – Henri Bergson – a
kind of tool or to be developed skill that
may help human himself – “<i>individuation</i>”
– to perceive and interpret other human beings and their surroudings – “<i>collectivum</i>” – in a more proper way; free
of disturbance and noise so more pure as an energetic entity ? Does this also
imply that the learning process for human – getting conscious – is an ultimate
way by using all perception tools during the 4 phases of learning, simply
translated into ”<i>learning-by-doing & (self-)
reflection</i>”, so by experiencing phenomena as a whole ? </span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<br />
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"></span>
<span style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;">
<span style="color: purple;">~~~ end of part 1 ~~~</span></span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-52565877574247803962013-02-28T05:32:00.000-08:002016-01-26T02:51:08.063-08:00Synergy (2)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="color: red;">Efficiency and Economics</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">The Autopoiesis Theory is based upon the unusual
definition for the organization for life itself. “<i>Autopoiesis is the minimum set of production rules conform what life
emerges and to maintain itself</i>”. It is thereby strongly focussed on the information
aspect of the theory. As a matter of fact life implies irrefutably matter
aspects here on earth. So life is not just an abstraction or reduction by
neglecting the physical part of it. Second the definition of autopoiesis gives
a limitation and deficiency of what life really is; the meaning of life. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Where the 3 Chilean biologists Varely, Uribe &
Maturama were trying to see these set of rules free of its structure. Their
researches show us that functionalities can be applied in many efficient and inefficient
ways by organs or systems. Efficiency means authenticity and natural behavings. While inefficiency means conditioned hehavings by the organ of human being; there
is no balance between individuation and collectivum. Survival here means
playing the political game of manipulation for personal interests, free of the
aspect of the will for survival – “<i>l’élan
vital</i>” ~ Henri Bergson. That’s the way most politicians and bancers are acting. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">It doesn’t matter if we discuss the microworld of
amoebas or our own society on meso level in comparance with the cosmos as the
macro structure. The biological life is in analogy with networking. It’s – yes –
about Matter, Energy and Information – the MEI-concept. Although is appears to
be that human is – within its original blueprint – unchangeable and will it
take perhaps over hundred thousands of years before changes are adopted within
human’s blueprint – an evolutionary autopoiesis. Autopoiesis, firstly manifesting
as a dissipative structure within the flow of matter, energy and information,
where macroscopic behavings are unpredictable regarding the microscopic behavings,
finally gaining the highest level of efficiency based upon a probability of its
predictional horizon with intended purposes – the Attractor. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Being aware of these limited aspects for the definition
of autopoiesis we can reconsider the flow of matter, energy and information. The
self-regulation – “<i>MorphoGenesis</i>” (René Thom) – leads
to the form or structure with the highest level of efficiency. It’s again the
implicate order (David Bohm), whether talking about biological organs or talents
and qualities of human beings. Being fractal the differences within the talents
of human beings determines the identity out of each individuation (Gilles Deleuze).
All these individuals together the identity of an organization emerges. The way
this organization communicates with its surrounding, expresses itself based
upon the (higher) values can be identified as the culture.</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "verdana" , "sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt;"><span style="color: purple;">When we are talking about synergy, we deal with
aspects as I described. So synergy is based upon new germs, new orders out of chaos
during discontinuing processes and interactions between organs, human beings
and organizations. Assure yourselves that there is more than the mentioned
energies, indeed human beings are spiritual beings. The realm of spirituality bring lots of
them to new orders, to new ways of thinking and living.</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
</div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-3594292203295625042.post-50115341496370399162013-02-28T02:00:00.004-08:002013-02-28T10:06:36.430-08:00Synergy (1)<div dir="ltr" style="text-align: left;" trbidi="on">
<span style="color: red;">Efficiency and Economics</span><br />
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span style="color: purple;"><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;">From the Chaos Theory we recognize the word “<i>synergy</i>”. It happens often that synergy
is regarded being col</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-GB; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;">-laboration</span><span lang="EN-GB" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"> </span></span><span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="color: purple;">– <i>“working-together</i>”. In a way it is.
Although the principle beyond synergy is completely different from
col-laboration. In what do these differ ? This is to be read in my newest book.</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">Earlier before I discussed the item “<i>Causality</i>” regarding its dimensions and
the way human may attribute the word “<i>causality</i>”
to a chain re-action. In a way we can do the same here. Col-laboration is fixed
upon visible or recognizable (pre-)actions, instructions and orders – the chain.
Synergy emerges from unknown orders and results often into unexpected effects.
Therefore it is easy to know the terms such as functionality, effectness,
efficiency, autopoiesis, attractor, spelling horizon and Complex Adaptive
Systems.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">An organ exists because of its functionality regarding
its surroundings. Interaction means adapting the network with other networks. The
fusion of several functionalities produce 1 or more new functionalities. It’s a
natural way of innovation. There’s a new order created from individual
self-ordening; balancing between individuation and collectivum and finding its
new ultimate order. That is possible because we deal with complex adaptive systems;
they are energetically open – dissipative systems such as stormy cyclones. If
there emerges new forms of col-laboration we speak of synergy. What does that
tell us about dealing with this (also) efficiency ? To give a simple answer : “<i>nothing</i>”. Finding its new way between
some humans, organs or organizations, the efficacy is determined by itself. The
aimed effectivity is also inherent to it and so is the efficiency. No one has
to do something about it. The way of emerging resulting in synergy makes that
the efficiency is as high as possible. If not, then these adaptive systems will
go on creating until the highest level is to be reached.<o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">What does efficiency mean in other words ? Efficiency is
synonymous to economics - about "<i>how to gain the best result with the lowest energetical input ?</i> "<i>Homo Economicus</i>". So if we are looking for higher efficiency, it is
better to generate it from new aspects. That means more confidence and less
control. Our human mind thinks that continuing the old ways brings solutions,
emerging new functionalities a creations imply discontinuity, because thinking
in solutions is chain thinking. Within the Chaos Theory it is completely
inpossible to gain new orders as I described. A catastrophe (Thom & Zeeman) may mean the
necessary discontinuity we need, especially during (financial) crises. A
catastrophe means that (a part of) a system or organ gets destroyed, whereby
space emerges for new orders. <o:p></o:p></span></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="color: #cc0000;">The moment of catastrophe is the necessary discontinuity
within the processes of our society. This moment scares lots of people because
they experience that as complete chaos. Chaos is an unidentified order, which
is implied, enfolded within every structure, although for human unrecognizable.</span><o:p></o:p></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><br /></span></div>
<div class="MsoNormal" style="line-height: 14.0pt; margin-bottom: .0001pt; margin-bottom: 0cm;">
<br /></div>
<span lang="EN-US" style="font-family: "Verdana","sans-serif"; font-size: 9.0pt; mso-ansi-language: EN-US; mso-bidi-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-bidi-language: AR-SA; mso-fareast-font-family: "Times New Roman"; mso-fareast-language: EN-US; mso-font-kerning: 11.0pt;"><span style="color: purple;">~~~ end of part 1 ~~~</span></span></div>
Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12916216944778420228noreply@blogger.com0