The power of changing
letters
My last book had the title “From Nomad upto Monad”. By exchanging
the 2 consonants the word changes of course. But in essence, does the meaning
of the word change in a extreme way ? No, it does not. Phonetically the words sound
almost the same. So do the words in the title of this chapter. So is it right
that ecology and economy almost mean the same ?
In earlier blogs I
described several aspects within the Chaos Theory, efficiency is an important
word within this theory. The word “economy”
has also a lot to do with the word “efficiency”.
Considering complex adaptive systems as dissipative structures – energically
open systems – then it is obvious that these kind of systems find their own new
order from the so-called chaos. When this new order complies to higher
efficiency, then the stream of matter, energy and information keeps on going
that way, in those loopings of that certain part of network. In a way this new
order is not predictable, because it finds out by itself : “auto-poiesis & morpho-genesis”; it’s
the implicate order. Described in a biological-mechanistic way. The physical
way as the opposite of the metaphysical way; “concrescence”.
The term “Ecology” – mostly related to the biological version of nature,
unfortunately the term “Economy” – is
strongly related to money nowadays. So the criterion for efficiency is related
to money. Neglecting and ignoring all aspects that lie beyond it. The real qualia
of whatever being reduced and transformed into the criterion called “money”. Efficiency is about nature,
about pureness, emerging from structures, that are no longer effective anymore.
What I mean is that effectiveness is synonymous to the word “functionality” – the reason to be alive
and the unique essence to survive. This unique essence is based upon the
combination of “Form & Function”,
where Form or Constructure represents the biological part and the function in a
way the psychological part in relationship with Teleology, what is linked to
the process of gaining consciousness. It manifests itself as described. In case
of human being I talked about the 2 integral processes; autopoiesis and
concrescence, leading to transcendence.
So it seems to be right that
human being has the capability to think, to create and generate, that’s pure
and awesome. The real Artisan – Artist, how close are these 2 words related ? –
works from other criterions than those related to money. Posing deadlines for
perfecting creations can be based upon financial criterions, but that has to do
with financial dependence, nothing less. Every amateur – its Amor or Love for
the activity – is based upon the nature and intrinsic motivation. Where this
motivation is highly congruent with someone's meaning of life. The way of gaining
this purpose for life is related to the thinking style, the temperament and anatomy. That
means pure Passion, the road of the heart to reach that.
And so I talk about nature, I
talk about the micro-Ecology of human, surrounded by the macro-Ecology, the
cosmic nature. If it seems that this relation – esoterically speaking – is so clear,
why would we disturbe this balance ? If there is a balance within the whole
universe, then it has to be economical as well, because nature & cosmos are
self regulating – morpho-genesis – structures, that are influenced by the whole
itself, not by a criterion as money, made up by man. Money is the tool to avoid
frustration when having no control of your life and those of other people. The secondary
product this process creates is Paranoia and-or Jealousy.
Money is used for greed, eager for power & control , to
demand the right to do with nature as man likes to. Destroying flora and fauna
for own benefits, while all the money in the world can’t buy animal species,
that were extincted because of man's activities during the last decennia. So what has money to
do with the economical structure of our Ecology ? Is our Economy really representing
our Ecology ?
Geen opmerkingen:
Een reactie posten