Causality vs Synchronicity

Chain : Cause and-or Effect

In what way are these 2 aspects in the title related to each other ?

Everything and perhaps also nothing, it is strongly dependable of the dimensions. The current society is keen of very analytical and cognitive processes, appointing to facts, evidence and concrete things. Is this thought about the chain right or is this a bias in the way of perceiving and what human thinks he is perceiving – interpreting ? This and more you may read in my latest book “From Nomad upto Monad”.

Science is trying very hard to reduce each phenomenon – no matter with what dimension – into evidence of concrete facts and appoint it to well-known matter. Read my earlier comment about “Psychology”, which originally means the study about one’s soul. It has been reduced into something physical as the study of the biological brains as a thoughts module of human’s. What does the Universe  tell you about it; a Voice coming from the Void ? What doe Ab-solutism mean ? Is that returning into an emptiness, where you can’t help letting go and drop all matter – earthal matter ? Ab-solutism from the Latin language concerning “solvere” or “releasing” emphasized with the praefix “ab”.

Referring to the word “causality”, perhaps you can imagine why this has become such an important term ? Is that correct ? Partly yes, more often not. As a matter of fact it implies comparing apples and oranges. Using the term “causality” has very much to do with cognitive behavings and thoughts; knowing, the “why” beyond the event and successively trying to make up appropriate rules, finding solutions and use them in the proper way. When is there this moment we have to deal with causality ? As a matter of fact when we are dealing with similar dimensions. So when a ship bounces upon a rock, then it gets damaged and starts leaking water. Cause and effect, both in a matter-dimension, namely mass, the lowest deduction of energy. How is cause-and-effect related when we go back in time ? The steersman makes an error in manoeuvring the ship to the coast with its rocks with the effects as been described. Here the relation exists of an action and a material aspect. What happened before that moment ? Yeah, then it becomes difficult. Did he have a headache, was he drunk, did he have a black out ? And what then happened even before that event ?

As a matter of fact you won’t find the answer. This has to do because here we deal with lots of dimensions of energies. The most easy and lowest deduction of energy is named matter and is pretty well perceivable. Some of the other energies are hard to perceive for people. Think for instance about your 5 plus 1 senses : “touch – matter” / “smell/taste – molecule/ion” / “hear – vibrating molecules” – “see – frequency” / “intuition – resonance”. A possible random gathering of energies with different kind of dimensions, which all resonate and create a new event, an implicate order, that manifests itself to people that consider such event as coincidence or contingency. Carl Jung called these kind of phenomena “Synchronicity” – an a-causal principle.

The coincidence is besides that energies gather at a certain moment and place, that they co-create in an integral way. What integrators are involved, is hard to say. That’s unique. Let’s say it has to do with Teleology, Determinism and Fate. The all known implicate order beyond the orders as far as human can deal with. In  a way dealing with causality is inapplicable. From that point of view you can tell that lots of people are working at the wrong activities, because they think they are solving problems while thinking having identified the right problems and the right causes. A cause that is often inapplicable within the tendencies of the current society. Let’s drop causality and find answers, which we can find out of the box of “causality”. That’s the power of intuition, our 6^th sense. Do you join me ?